ArboristSite.com Sponsors
 
 



 

 


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Husky 262 XP

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    SOUTHEAST NYS
    Posts
    437
    Credits
    1

    Husky 262 XP

    I have a husky 262xp with a 24" bar (it was 18"). I keep reading posts about various saws but never the 262 xp. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I just use it for firewood and occasional takedowns. Got a Husky 35 for climbing ( do that even less now.......since I discovered I was afraid of heights sorta speak(10 years after the fact.... a sloath worked faster than me).....even bucket work made me nervous ....and I don't mean KFC either. 8^)

  2. #2
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    rbtree's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,980
    Credits
    51
    If I recall, the 262 was the first Husky with air injecton. It was ahead of its time, I think. Never had one, but a friend did and it served him well. Husky just discontinued the very similar 362.

  3. #3
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    stanley co nc
    Posts
    3,059
    Credits
    10
    i well recall the time my dad finally got talkd into taking one o those big passenger jets..at the end o the run way the pilot hat to divert or crash ,,as the thing wouldnt leave the ground..
    dad ruined a perfectly good set of shoes plowing the pavement..
    awm

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    397
    Credits
    15
    NYCHA,

    You don't hear much about the 262XP since its heyday has past, and there aren't a whole bunch out there. IMO, it was merely outstanding during its production, and the ones I still have are prized. A power/weight hot rod, tuned for performance alone, it wouldn't make it in todays restrictive environment. It like a '66 muscle car in an emissions-controlled world.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    295 tramp likes this.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    397
    Credits
    15
    262XP's built early 1990's.....
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    shoot501's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    NW Ark.
    Posts
    172
    Credits
    5
    Husky 262XP= Old school, gone the way of the Mac 10-10 and the Homelite XL12. You new a new modern saw so e-mail me and I'll trade you out of that antique!
    Larry

  7. #7
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    stanley co nc
    Posts
    3,059
    Credits
    10
    wonder ,and im serious for a change .. if it can be bored out to 70cc displacement.. u a kind man shoot
    awm

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    SOUTHEAST NYS
    Posts
    437
    Credits
    1
    It works fine for me. I might have put five gallons of gas through it at most. Like I said....i use it primarily for firewood. If I was doing production work then I would naturally step to a newer saw.

    Up to this point the only parts I put into it is a new bar and a couple of chains. Is their anything I should be particularly aware of or be looking for by way of maintenance? I will tell you this....you really need a good grip on the saw when trying to start it.(high compression)

    SMITH

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    shoot501's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    NW Ark.
    Posts
    172
    Credits
    5
    All BS aside I think the 262XP is one of the best in the 60cc class. Been wanting one for a long time, someday, maybe.............
    Larry

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    18
    Credits
    0
    Loved my 262xp, liked it every bit as well as my current 044 Stihl. I bought mine in the early '90's from a dealer that was going out of business, and only had a few saws left. I got a great deal. If not for the circumstances, I would have bought a 272xp (almost identical to current 372xp, not sure of the differences). The 262 was a virtual twin to the 272, just 10 cc's smaller. Physically the saws were identical, except for the decals, you could not tell the difference. This is probably why you see so many more 272/372's than 262/362's. If you're going to tote around that size/weight of saw, may as well get the 72cc version.
    I also disagree that the 262xp is old school. It still appears to me to be very close to a 62cc version of the current 372xp.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    shoot501's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    NW Ark.
    Posts
    172
    Credits
    5
    Farmboy I was just BS ing about oldschool, I think the 262XP is very up to date. I must disagree on the size weight issue, I believe the 262XP is about the same size as the 257 [been wrong before], if so it would be smaller and lighter than the 272/372XP. Had a 257, great saw, got a 372XP, great saw.
    Larry

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    18
    Credits
    0
    shoot501,

    I still have the Husky brochure from when I bought my saw. I will check out the weight of the 262xp vs. 272xp this evening and report back tomorrow. I remember looking at 272's when buying oil, chain loops, etc. at another dealer, and thinking that they were physically identical to my 262.

    I no longer have my 262, I let a brush fire get out and burned it up. I replaced it with an 044 Stihl. According to the manufacturers literature, the 044 and 372 are virtually identical in weight. If my Stihl is any heavier than the old 262, I can't tell it.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    bass_on_tap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    229
    Credits
    42
    Back when the 262 and the 272 were both being sold as current saws, the 262 had the best "power to weight " ratio of any of the Husky saws being sold at that time. I still have the catalog from that year and that was the reason I had 4 of them over the years. I've since sold them all. A few years back I sold one on ebay as "new", never been run, clean as a whistle and got good money for it. They were great saws. Dave

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    wv
    Posts
    123
    Credits
    0
    I had one..... ran it for years it was a good saw.......Wade
    Soulshine........better than Sunshine......better than Moonshine........???? sure better than rain..........Allman Bros

  15. #15
    Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Stafford, VA
    Posts
    43
    Credits
    6
    254xp,257 and 262xp were all based on the chasis/platform.
    Shindaiwa 360
    John Deere CS36
    Stihl 028
    Husqvarna 257
    Solo 667
    Sachs Dolmar 166 K&N Intake

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. husky 365 or 362 xp
    By todd mikanowicz in forum Chainsaw
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-24-2007, 11:55 PM
  2. Husky 339 XP
    By Fast in forum Chainsaw
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-15-2003, 02:29 PM
  3. Husky 262 piston & ring
    By Tony Snyder in forum Chainsaw
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-22-2002, 07:47 PM
  4. husky 372 xp
    By bcooley in forum Chainsaw
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-30-2002, 03:43 PM
  5. husky 254 xp
    By lollydude in forum Chainsaw
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-12-2002, 05:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 0.26786 seconds with 45 queries [Server Loads: 0.87 1.14 : 1.32]