current wants:
john deere 66sv clutch cover (it's a yellow echo 610evl).
18" k041 poulan or k095 small mount husky bar 3/8 0.50
a running homelite 3100.
stihl 020av flywheels
pm me.
You know I am kind of liking that Idea! a shared design between two respected companies to produce what looks to be a very promising product!![]()
Hi Javelin,
>>Establishment of Yamabiko Corporation
Kioritz Corporation, Tokyo, Japan and Shindaiwa Corporation, Hiroshima, Japan established a joint hlding company "Yamabiko Corporation" on December 1st, 2008 by means of transfer of stocks of both companies.
Consequently, both Kioritz Corporation and shindaiwa Corporation have become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Yamabiko Corporation.<<
I like the Echo saws I have, one of which is a 520. Once you richen the engines up they run great.
Best wishes,
Bob
The CS-600 weighs in at 13lbs claimed by Echo. I have always liked their trimmers but wonder why they choose not to advertise horse power. Are they afraid of lower numbers than the competition?
13lbs for 59.8 cc CS-600 vs. 13.6lbs for Dolmars 79cc PS-7900
All I can say is Echos CS-600 better be one heck of a saw when its only 9.6 ounces less than the 7900 Dolmar.
![]()
That's a very good point that you bring up. 600 echo looks great but I would wonder too about the hp. the warranty is great but who wants to always bring a saw back to be fixed!!! I want to know the price and the HP. how can we make a good choice without the info?? I would say 7900 for weight to HP and they still our very fair on the $$$$.
![]()
We need more information to make a good choice. thanks Bill
028 super
029 super-- Makita 6401 dcs
038 mag II
064 av 25 inch bar
61
266
268 xp
630 jonsered
HUSQVARNA 49 ( 1999)
HUSQVARNA 266 needs carb kit
Thank you all for a great site for chainsaws.
Back to the numbers BS, when someone can explain why a Stihl MS260 is 3.2 hp and a MS290 (every one I've run has been a dog, maybe they all had 3/8 chain) is 3.8 hp I might believe published numbers a little. Stihl or husky doesn't have a saw that compares to the 7900 either, just Solo. Steve
Last edited by mountainlake; 01-19-2009 at 02:43 AM.
I muffler modded one of our CS-510's a few weeks ago. Big wake up call for that saw. It's now just a tad faster than our Husky 55, but the 55's chain isn't nearly as good as the CS-510's. With a good chain they would be just about dead even.
We are still waiting for our CS-6700 to return. I sent it to an Echo technician, who is rebuilding the shortblock for us. We're going to use it as a project saw, testing it's performance in all areas, stock, muffler modded, then with some porting, etc.
We had a CS-440 in our line-up at one point, it was stolen from a friend of mine who had borrowed it for a couple of small jobs. It was OK, but not nearly as strong unmodded as a stock CS-510, at least with an 18" bar. It was much happier with a 16" bar.
I'm wondering about Echo's 60cc entry. The CS-6700 is a pretty heavy saw, all metal case, tank, etc, downsizing it to 60cc would make for one HEAVY saw!.......Cliff
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
Husky 181SE
Husky 480CD
Husky 268XPS
Husky 262XP
Husky 55 (2)
Husky 50
Echo 510
Echo CS-370 (2)
Echo 360T
CLIFF look at the pics of the new CS600 it is a diffrent saw in build than the 670 is!
About the 1201 it looks like it's design in the early 70's and it looks like there's no kickback handle infront of the bar. I'm I wrong??
Edit: And why don't they list HP on each saw on the site
Last edited by Norwegian Wood; 01-19-2009 at 05:58 AM.
2001 Talon 16" Sold
2005 Partner "The dirt saw in parts"
2007 Jonsered 2152 13" & 20"
2008 Echo Power Pruner
1984 Stihl 034 AV 13" Sold
19?? Jo-Bu ??? 12" Given Away
19?? Husky 444 13"
19?? Husky 242G "The project"
19?? Husky 242G 13"
2008 Stihl MS390 15" Sold
2009 Dolmar 7900
I dont recall Echo publishing HP numbers on anything, but it didnt keep me from buying their trimmers. I really like their balance and low vibes,mine have more than paid for themselves.
Statement from ECHO.
Horse power is not the best way to rate a 2 stroke engines power. When comparing the performance of two-stroke engines, going by horsepower is not really an accurate way to determine the performance capabilities of a unit. The reason for this, is that there are no industry standards set for rating the horsepower of a two-stroke engine. Due to the fact that there are no set standards, this allows too may variables to come into play allowing for possibly an incorrect or misleading horsepower rating. ECHO does not publish horse power ratings.
Echo CS-306 12in bar
Echo CS-370 16in bar
NEW Echo CS-450 18in bar
Echo CS8000 36in bar
Homelite 360 24in bar
JONSEREDS 49SP locked up now, (went through flood)
Troy Built 6ft pole saw 8in bar
Warm Morning model 520
Warm Morning model 120 (The Hog Feeder)
Lopi Answer (insert)
Jotul #8
Vogelzang Boxwood stove
MTD 20 Ton splitter
Well horsepower/kw is how the rest of the world does it, Echo should do the same, but I would imagine the reason they dont is because their lacking in that department compared to the competition.
Since Echo knows the best unit of measurement for a two-stroke engine, they should report the specs on how much energy their product produces. jmho
I really like the look of that 1201!!. It has really old school lines.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks