ArboristSite.com Sponsors
 
 



 

 


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: If the rope is too short...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Mnchen, Germany
    Posts
    429
    Credits
    0

    Cool If the rope is too short...

    Do you ever just tie them together?

    I have 2 120ft ropes and a shorter one. Sometimes the 120 is too short. For access via footlock I just put a biner tween the splices so I have a 240ft rope When I get in the tree, seperate the lines and use a traditional system.

    I have only done this twice. Yes it means you have a LONG footlock and you can't hit the ground once in work mode. To decend, I decend, stop, redirect the rope around the stem with my RG, and then hit the ground.


    Note orange and green line together
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Mnchen, Germany
    Posts
    429
    Credits
    0
    2 pics going up
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #3
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    treeman82's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    connecticut
    Posts
    3,844
    Credits
    547
    I've done that several times with rigging lines, but never had the need to with climbing lines before, thank G-d.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    tshanefreeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Brandon, MB, Canada
    Posts
    232
    Credits
    5
    So I take it that you biner is located at the top of your system so that you don't have climber over the join????

    If so, you'll have to be careful that your 'biner isn't ontop of the attachment limb, because if it was, you would be side loading your 'biner.......not to mention probably twisting it.

    I'll be interested in what others have to say. As long as the load is PROPERLY placed within the 'biner then you're probably fine. The only thing that I would worry about is if you need a fast escape from the tree..........say if you cut yourself. If you had to lanyard onto the trunk half way down, reposition your line, then proceed..............you could run out of time! Perhaps investing in a 300' line would be the safest route if you work in tall trees on a regular basis.
    Last edited by tshanefreeman; 12-02-2004 at 05:46 PM.
    Shane Freeman (B.Sc.F., AASc.UF., AASc.LD., AASc.TM.)ISA Certified Arborist # PR-4621A

    Owner/Operator
    Total Landscape Solutions
    ...Helping Canadians Preserve Their Investments...

  5. #5
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    NickfromWI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,036
    Credits
    15
    There's nothing wrong with either of these methods. It's fun developing a personal technique that you like that allows you to ascend PAST where the bend (a knot that joins the ends of two ropes together) is.

    love
    nick

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    arboromega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    350
    Credits
    0
    well, i wont say this is ok nick. you introduced an new component into the climb. and more components just means another opportunity for failure. i keep a 150' rope and an 80' rope. you know you can always hit a lower limb and rope advance some. rope is not so expensive that you have to risk a hardware failure by linking two short one together.
    ISA Certified Tree Worker Test Administrator
    ISA Certified Aborist

    "Man must go back to nature for information" - thomas paine

  7. #7
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    NickfromWI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,036
    Credits
    15
    Arboromega, I must respectfully disagree with the ideas you give in your post. Yes, you are introducing a link, bus simply using a carabiner is not risking hardware failure any more than if you clip that carabiner from the rope directly to your saddle.

    Carabiner's don't just BREAK. If they did, I wouldn't be using them...none of us would. The use the Nathan described is exactly what the manufacturers had in mind when they made the 'biners; an in line pull along the major axis/spine with soft (non-metallic) connections (ie other 'biners).

    Your argument seems to imply that you would discourage the use of 'biners and snaphooks for saddle connection and would rather tie your climbing line directly to the d-ring on your saddle.

    Erring on the side of caution is wise, but seems as if you're taking it a bit too far.

    love
    nick

  8. #8
    Former Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,813
    Credits
    0
    Not to mention that the carabiner was loaded only to half the load since we know Nathan knows to leave it short of the limb, and a carabiner is carrying full load at the saddle.

    Nice scenery and weather make even a longer footlock a lot better than factory work.

    Glen

  9. #9
    Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    houston
    Posts
    59
    Credits
    0
    come on guys. You make money on your ropes. We complain about customers being cheap when a hack does it for less but don't follow that same attitude toward ourselves. I own 2-120' 1-200' and get ready for this one 1-400'. Yea I know 400' is way excessive but in a weird scenario it could possibily be necessary. Blue moon ofcourse. I want a 600' reel cut into 4-60' 3-80' 1-120' and 200' xtra. This way I can retire a rope on job and not have to leave to get one. and yes I can be excessive. Trzz

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    wct4life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the south coast
    Posts
    247
    Credits
    0
    I'm going to have to agree with Tshane and Arbor on this. The more components=more risk. Remember K.I.S.S. I trust Krabs as long as I can see them. After you send one up a tree, you can't tell what might have happened to it.

    Once, I isolated a line in a tree, with a pulley on the end and my climbing line through it. The pulley was attached to a Krab and the knot I used was an 8 on a bight w/ girth hitch. after ascending I noticed that the girth hitch rolled down, and actually unlocked my tri-act krab. After that, I decided never again.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Gord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Vancouver Canada
    Posts
    375
    Credits
    5
    what nathan describes is perfectly acceptable. he's in exactly the same situation when ascending as if he was only on a singled rope, doubled. he's not suggesting to work the tree with an unpassable spot in his work line, which would be dangerous, nor would he let the biner side load on the top of the limb i would hope.

    a good example of making a system unecessarily complex and dangerous is what wct4life describes. yikes!

    i depended on many ropes tied together, more for pulling trees over and rigging than for ascending tho. i've got a 200' rigging line and have had to tie on another short one so that both ends would be on the ground.
    "Arbolist...look up the word. I don't know, maybe I made it up. Anyway, it's an arbor-tree-ist, somebody who knows about trees." -George W. Bush

  12. #12
    The Silverback
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    xander9727's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,044
    Credits
    19
    I feel this technique is safe for entering a tree. I do not feel that it is a good idea to work in a tree with a rope that is too short to reach the ground. This is a recipe for disaster. If you don't have an out things can go from bad to horrible in short order. Will it probably cause a problem......No. Will it possibly cause a problem.....Yes. I guess it all depends on how much risk management you want to deal with. Personally I have used techniques like this in a pinch. I wouldn't however, use them as a SOP.
    How you do anything, is how you do everything.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingsville, MO
    Posts
    416
    Credits
    10
    I agree with xander in that any line too short to reach the ground could spell disaster, not in every day work, but in emergency situations minds may not think quick enough.... I also agree with what wct learned, keep it simple, I'd say it was good to retire the method he described. I agree that the biner would be fine, and I would feel safe enough climbing on it - regardless of where it is in your rigging, I'm sure everyone of us is putting atleast as much stress on a biner at some point in the day; but like treeco said, I'd rather trust myself in knot tying in a situation like this in which I couldn't see the connection.

  14. #14
    Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Columbia SC
    Posts
    88
    Credits
    0
    Excellent, excellent thread. The bottom line is that everyone is thinking about playing it safe.

    Good job people.
    Can-Do-It

  15. #15
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Tom Dunlap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Austin...but I'm 'from' Minnesota
    Posts
    3,245
    Credits
    15
    When I need to tie two ropes together I use double fisherman's knots. Compact and neat. I really like the rope configuration too. The mechanics of the knot/hitch seem to work really well.

    Why not use a biner to clip two splices? Any good reasons?

    KISS is a good plan. But...if you only have two short ropes whaddya gonna do?

    Having a line that goes all of the way to the ground is a good practice. There comes a height when this is impractical though. I'd venture to say that over 95% of the climbing is done below that height though.
    canopytree@earthlink.net
    http://www.isa-arbor.com/
    Peace is Patriotic too!
    We must learn to think both logically and bio-logically.
    `Ed Abbey
    Copyright 2010 Tom Dunlap All rights reserved.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. the 'Fly' rope is in!
    By treeclimber165 in forum SHERRILLtree
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-19-2003, 04:52 PM
  2. True Double Rope
    By Ghivelder in forum Commercial Tree Care and Climbing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-16-2003, 04:51 PM
  3. Choosing Rope For Climbing
    By Marky Mark in forum Commercial Tree Care and Climbing
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-28-2002, 07:54 PM
  4. Mechanical rope grabs for rigging
    By Tom Dunlap in forum Commercial Tree Care and Climbing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-07-2002, 11:04 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 0.28318 seconds with 45 queries [Server Loads: 2.40 2.28 : 1.84]