Well over the course of the next week or two I'm going to hybridize this filthy 064 with a ported 066 top end...
View attachment 486492 View attachment 486493 View attachment 486494 View attachment 486495
First things first...bath time.
I envy the roadside trash pile finds other members show off over on the eastern side of the states. You just never see people throw stuff like that away around here. If I remember right it came in a pile of parts an old retired Stihl tech gave me for rebuilding a carb. He still builds for loggers and strictly works on 440/460's, 066/660's, and 088/880's.Be honest....
You dug that out at the dump didn't you?
I would have too, in a heartbeat!
" It needs the precious"View attachment 486561
The key thing here, IMO, is when you "big bore" you are making your engine "more square" - i.e. a higher bore/stroke ratio. This means that the engine will prefer to produce it's peak power at higher revs. So I suppose that as long as you appreciate this in other parts of the system, port/ignition timing, carburetion, engine robustness, then I guess everything will be good.Whenever there's an uncomfortable silence in the conversation I always ask, how about those Giants ( SF ). I don't think he meant any harm in suggesting using the 064 cylinder, I took it as there will be little actual performance gain in going 066 hybrid. I personally haven't done the conversion yet but am interested as I have an 064 that I built a few years ago that I have done a lot of milling with and is now tired and in need of a rebuild again. What experience can you share to go with the statement that no gains can be made?
Whenever there's an uncomfortable silence in the conversation I always ask, how about those Giants ( SF ). I don't think he meant any harm in suggesting using the 064 cylinder
This is a true 064 crank.066 poly flywheel crank.
Enter your email address to join: