ericjeeper
Addicted to ArboristSite
. How I've managed to avoid buying a second saw by now, I'll never know...
Trust me it will not last long.. You will be owning, or shall I say be owned by a 7900....
. How I've managed to avoid buying a second saw by now, I'll never know...
Well, those are all good comments. Every body has their point of view - I guess that's why there are so darned many saws to choose from.
A couple of last considerations for the smaller saws 50-60 cc's. For those of us who are of smaller stature (me I'm 5'7") the smaller, trimmer saws are easier to use hence I feel they are safer. I feel the little slower cutting speed gives you a chance to react in a bucking cut so as not to pinch the saw so often.
And even if the limbing goes quicker with a 70cc saw as PA Plumber says - I'd rather have it be more controlled. Heck - making firewood is sorta fun . . . I'm in no hurry to have it end all that soon. :greenchainsaw:
Al
Trust me it will not last long.. You will be owning, or shall I say be owned by a 7900....
For firewood, I cut skinny standing-dead lodgepole almost exclusively, so a 50cc saw is a perfect choice for me. It does the job with minimal effort. Were there actually any hardwoods in my neighborhood, or if I cut many trees bigger than 12-14 inches, I'd likely augment my MS270 with something in the 70cc range. Your choice, IMO, depends entirely on what "all kinds of wood" means.
Oh, and this is my first post here after months of lurking. Thanks to all you guys (and the few gals I've spotted) for your knowledge. How I've managed to avoid buying a second saw by now, I'll never know...
If you've settled on a 50 cc saw ( and that's not a bad thing ) , then get a ms 260 or 260 pro. Mighty handy for limbing, although a wee bit small for bucking and felling. They'll get the job done up till 30 in. or so , but things would go alot quicker with a 361 ( of course you have to tote the extra 2 lbs. around ) Honestly, if all you are cutting is 12-14 in. , then go for the 260.
I am going to back you up on this one! I love my 60cc saw in 80% of the wood I cut, but when I get into the bigger stuff the time saved with a big saw is nice plus I like to hear them run! When you cut in high country you do need 10cc more everything just feels sluggish at high elevation. Something most people forget is you do really lose some power up there. I don't know what the elevation is like in Australia so we just might need some more info from the original poster. Then again if you don't have to pack the saw into the woods hell get the biggest one you are comfortable with.I guess it must just all boil down to what kind of wood you are collecting and what you want to pack around.
A lot of guys say 50cc is the way to go. I tried that... wasn't real impressed.
Some say a 60cc saw is the best, because its still a light weight saw but fairly light. Been there, just won't turn and burn like I want.
A few guys suggest that a 70cc saw it about right. Im starting to agree with them. I would consider a 70cc saw driving a 24" bar full comp the starting firewood saw.
If you want to ask the best, I would almost say step up to a 90cc saw, with a similar bar and chain, for making your bucking cuts. I tend to be attracted to trees under 24" diameter (douglas fir) but there are still plenty of bucking cuts to be made. I would love a big saw to tear up these logs in no time flat. The faster Im done cutting, the faster Im done getting wood.
Now shouldn't we all say he needs two saws. The 50cc and the 70cc. When your on AS it happens sooner or later.
I'm a fan of the 50-60cc class saws for making firewood.
Heck if you gain even 3 seconds using a 70cc or larger saw per bucking cut on say a 16-18" log whats the advantage for the whole tree ??? Maybe two minutes in cutting time?
Not worth the weight penalty if you ask me. Also those bigger saws are a pain in butt for limbing!
That Husky 357 XP your looking at would be perfect!
Al
If you are only going to get one saw I would make it the MS361 (and so would the husky guys ) light enough to limb with but enough a$$ to get the bigger stuff done.
No we would say the 357
Enter your email address to join: