Legal climb?
If not and the trunk is recognizable, the parks look online for videos. A friend said he was fined for using a drone in redwood parks. If private land, different story. I have to watch where I photograph and what gear I use myself
A simple, no, would suffice.Thanks,
I have a couple of comments and I hope you don't take it wrong.
Park rangers watching a bunch of YouTube videos looking for possible illegal activity when there are guys out there cutting burls and such and who knows what else.
What we need is more respectful, tree loving climbers, hikers and photographers like yourself out there with eyes and ears at all ours of the night and day to catch the ones doing the real damage.
"Legal" from what we the people have written in the last 100 years? A tree like this is more likely to be removed to widen the road, change an exit or build a hotel or just turn it into picnic tables....LEGALLY.... then be lost otherwise. I don't think you would disagree but I think it would be better to look at it from this trees perspective or the rest of the forest and go back a short period of time and restore all that has been lost...LEGALLY.
I often think, what if the Native Americans had ropes and pulleys like we do. I know, it's just thought but I suspect the forest would still be here and everyone would be climbing and enjoying it.
Thanks,
I have a couple of comments and I hope you don't take it wrong.
Park rangers watching a bunch of YouTube videos looking for possible illegal activity when there are guys out there cutting burls and such and who knows what else.
What we need ... SNIP ... it's just thought but I suspect the forest would still be here and everyone would be climbing and enjoying it.
Enter your email address to join: