372 xpw

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I think it was the EPA's infinite wisdom protecting us. Maybe some others will chime in on this with more detailed info.
 
The new 372xp has X-Torq in small letters on the left side cover. This has replaced the old 372xp and xpw. From all I hear the new 372xp is a very good saw.
 
1113210280_erLfJ-M.jpg
 
Hippies.

When it became socially unaccptable to curb stomp 'em, shave thier heads and put a flea collar on them, they bred, and voted.

Stay safe!
Dingeryote
 
Yeah! The more I read, I realize I bought at the right time. Mine was a new in the box 2009 someone had in thier closet. I take it the new EPA saws are a little different to mod?

Yes, much different to mod, been a few threads lately. Good thing is the X-Torq appears to make more power, more torq? And folks seem very happy in stock form.
 
Got my 75CC XPW before they became extinct. Five or six tanks of mix thru it, probably not even broken in yet, setting pristine in my basement. Manuf. date of 51 week of 2006.I use the 365 much more, but i'll keep it just the same. Probably a few on somebodys shelf somewhere for sale, just getting harder to find by the minute. Mine might be an early one, as it was two years old, from build date, when i bought it.
 
Last edited:
Husky says 10 hrs of break in. I have 6 tanks thru mine and bet I don't have 3 hours on it yet. Is 10 hours stretching it for break in on a saw? Heck, on my quads I set the rings for about 1 tank then run it like I stole it.
 
I don't remember on the old 346, but the new one took 10-11 tanks to wake up. Very noticeable. Oh and I run them hard from day one.
 
Back
Top