Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tree Care Forums
Firewood, Heating and Wood Burning Equipment
Planning to build log splitter on a shoesting budget
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Arborist Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bowtieman427" data-source="post: 4984645" data-attributes="member: 124470"><p>Valves and planning. Is it ok to get the Prince LS 3000-2 dedicated to run the log splitter cylinder ONLY and then later if I added a Hydrualic wedge and log lift use Prince Control Valve- RD523CCAA5A4B1 2 Spool Valve- 25 GPM -4- way/3-pos-spring center both spools 3/4" in and out ports NTP 3/4 " working ports NTP with Power beyond. At a later point the RD523CCAA5A4B1 would be first in series of valves and the LS 3000-2 would be last in the line. Not 100% sure if this is OK to do. once again planning stages with a future out look. I do like having a simple resonable valve dedicated to the splitter cylinder. If is rails it would NOT break the bank on replacement parts. Thanks in advance</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bowtieman427, post: 4984645, member: 124470"] Valves and planning. Is it ok to get the Prince LS 3000-2 dedicated to run the log splitter cylinder ONLY and then later if I added a Hydrualic wedge and log lift use Prince Control Valve- RD523CCAA5A4B1 2 Spool Valve- 25 GPM -4- way/3-pos-spring center both spools 3/4" in and out ports NTP 3/4 " working ports NTP with Power beyond. At a later point the RD523CCAA5A4B1 would be first in series of valves and the LS 3000-2 would be last in the line. Not 100% sure if this is OK to do. once again planning stages with a future out look. I do like having a simple resonable valve dedicated to the splitter cylinder. If is rails it would NOT break the bank on replacement parts. Thanks in advance [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top