ArboristSite.com Sponsors
 
 



 

 


Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: What are these two Maples?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    Chucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    386
    Credits
    0

    What are these two Maples?

    Leaves:



  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    Chucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    386
    Credits
    0
    Oops, sorry about the large image. Here's the bark of the two respective two trees:




    http://www.chuckdaniels.com/index/Page1.html

  3. #3
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bottineau, ND
    Posts
    505
    Credits
    0
    Sugar Maple on Left, Norway Maple on Right. Norway leaf is usually a little wider that it is tall, Norway is usually shiny on both top and bottom. 'Seems to fit this picture and the tree bark also.

    Bob Underwood

  4. #4
    Former Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,813
    Credits
    0
    Sugar on the left and probably black on the right.  Or both sugar.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    Chucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    386
    Credits
    0
    Nice, Glen, you got it. Sugar and Black Maple. Ain't often you get to beat out the professor. Looks like reputation points for you!

    The hairy petioles give it away:


    http://www.chuckdaniels.com/index/Page1.html

  6. #6
    Manned by Boderators
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Nickrosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    2,992
    Credits
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by glens
    Sugar on the left and probably black on the right. 
    Good call.
    Every child should have the opportunity to climb a tree.
    ---Alex Shigo, Pithy Points #698

    ISA Certified Arborist: WI-0562A

  7. #7
    Former Member
    Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,813
    Credits
    0
    Yeah, well not as good as the call I made last weekend!  You better follow up on that.  I kicked myself all the way home for not going back in and setting you up after you left...

  8. #8
    Arboristsite MVP
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bottineau, ND
    Posts
    505
    Credits
    0
    Chuck, Okay if I include these images in my collection I use for class? That is what I like about this site. It gives me a chance to keep up on things I do not see too often in ND. I like these trivia type deals. It keeps us thinking!!!

    Bob

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Reputation
    Chucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    386
    Credits
    0
    Bob, you know the answer to that, Yes!

    The Sugar Maple/Black Maple distinction has fascinated me for a couple years now. I never really noticed the difference between them until a professor (Donald Leopold, ESF, Syracuse) pointed out to me the difference between them both anatomically and ecologically. Now, when in the woods I always look for Black Maples to see if the ecological distinction attributed to them generally holds true -- and from my own observations, generally I think it does. The Black Maple is generally more tolerant of poorer, less silty soils than the Sugar Maple, I think. But to complicate things, it appears that they readily cross-breed with Sugars, so it's often difficult to "peg" a Black Maple as true.

    Some taxonomists/botanists like to class the Black Maple as a subspecies of the Sugar Maple, but my own personsal bias is it's a species of its own, despite its proclivity to hybridize. Its ecological niche in poorer, wetter soils is indeed different from the Sugar Maple.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2 maples
    By treeman82 in forum Commercial Tree Care and Climbing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2003, 09:47 AM
  2. Midwest sugar maples
    By aharleyguy45 in forum Nursery
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-26-2002, 02:45 PM
  3. Tapping Maples
    By Oakdude in forum Commercial Tree Care and Climbing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-20-2002, 05:18 PM
  4. Dying Norway Maples
    By underwor in forum Trivia
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-05-2002, 01:08 PM
  5. Sugar Maples - chemical tolerance
    By tcaslick in forum Homeowner Helper Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-16-2001, 07:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 0.16595 seconds with 44 queries [Server Loads: 0.84 1.18 : 1.61]