Adirondack
ArboristSite Operative
I really like the auto tune feature of my 550 XP. If Husqvarna is planning on coming out with the auto turn version of the 3120xp I want to wait and purchase one. Does anyone know?
I think that, at least for their top products, most major manufacturers are carefully weighing to skip Autotune/M-Tronic altogether and jump to fuel injection.
Autotune is great and works well, but it's really nothing more than a stop-gap measure.
I suspect that famous Honda two stroke patent floating around is not really aimed at manufacturing a Honda-branded engine, but at selling two stroke DFI patents and/or Keihin fuel system components to other manufacturers. If someone has the resources to make it work, and work well, that's Honda.
And Rotax.... Their E-TEC system they have been using on their 2-stroke snowmobiles since 2009 is quite amazing.
Only thing about these modern hi-tech EFI systems for 2-stroke engines is the electrical needed to run them. The Rotax E-TEC system uses electromagnetically actuated fuel injectors. Plus there are other engine monitoring systems in play that are needed to make the whole system work properly. My layman's guess is that the size and output requirements to operate such systems may still be impractical for implementation on a power saw.
But technology advances further every day with components getting smaller and smaller and more capable of doing the jobs needed to do.
I am sure it's coming at some point.
But they're not. Size and weight are big issues, and if it's not direct injection it has no advantages at all over a feedback carb on a single cylinder 2-stroke. Regardless of if you use an injector or a venturi/jet to deliver the fuel, you still need basically the same scheme to measure and control the mixture in closed loop.If saws are the same as dirt bikes, the only restraining factor is money.
But they're not. Size and weight are big issues, and if it's not direct injection it has no advantages at all over a feedback carb on a single cylinder 2-stroke. Regardless of if you use an injector or a venturi/jet to deliver the fuel, you still need basically the same scheme to measure and control the mixture in closed loop.
However you must have a system that is mostly correct even without feedback. A carb is a simple passive device that will still work reasonably well open loop. A fuel injection system is an active device that does nothing without active control systems even when it is open loop.
I disagree on several points. A bike is an order of magnitude larger than a saw, so the solutions developed there don't apply directly, and direct injection systems have not been developed for OPE like chainsaws.Those were exactly the same doubts we had back in the days for trials bike, were size and, even more critically, weight are paramount concerns. When Honda announced a liquid cooled, fuel injected four stroke commercial trials bike, we all thought it would be a lumbering behemoth. It wasn't.
The doubts you express are well grounded in reality, but those problems are not impossible to solve, especially given the solutions already exist and it's all a matter of miniaturization.
I think the main driver here will be emissions: as power equipment goes, legislation has not proceeded according to a schedule but by fits. If legislation stays as it is, you are most likely right and there will be no need for fuel injection. If not, fuel injection will surely become much more appealing.
Enter your email address to join: