Search results

Pretty sure it’s the same material just different colour

Does appear the 462 has a flatter power curve

I did manage to find this chart made from the kwf test reports

Kwf in Germany

Kwf test report

17% is a pretty decent margin considering it’s only got 8% more displacement

462 absolutely has more torque. No contest. I run ‘em both

For only 200 grams more the 462 has heaps more torque, 4.1 nm vs 4.8nm

Go be a **** somewhere else

I was just saying the 260 reminded me of a Dremel, no need to be a d i c k

Ever used a Dremel?

The 2 bearing failures i am referring to are from a friend who works at another company, first time they have been mentioned online, both stock saws. So my point based on my own experience of the 572 and 462 having the same durability, what is the point of having 6203 bearings on a 70cc saw...

We have both the 462 and 572 at work, we are not seeing much difference between them in terms of durability . Its also not a good look when you type ''572xp'' into Google images and on the 6th row of images you see this. I also know of two other 572 bearing failures from other people in my...

I don't get why though, the 372 OE , 440,460,461,462 just to name a few all had 6202 bearings and they never had any bearing issues. So why does Husqvarna now need to use 6203 bearings to make their 70cc saws reliable?

If you want a saw that spins bearings get the 572

No it's correct there are two covers for the 572

How many hours is on it?

It's finger licking good

Does anyone have the KWF test report for the 572 and 462?

Does anyone have the KWF report for the 462 and 572?