Crappy Stihl Cylinder - Looks like ChiCom Garbage!!!

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This thread has caused me to start looking for that fallout shelter we built in the sixties. Dang, wish we hadn't cut down that apple tree. Where was that thing?

Later .........
 
Ok, so the quality isn't up to what was produced in past years. Spank me.

If you look into the ports of a Ski-Doo snowmachine cylinder, it looks really nice, nicer than the old Stihl pics I've seen. Then you look into a Polaris Fugi-engined (Fugi Heavy Industries), snowmachine. Big difference. Both machines run like crazy though.

Haven't seen a Cat cylinder yet.
 
Haha, you prove my point perfectly. Doesn't that particular saw even have a funny nickname that is repeatedly mentioned here? Drippy or something lol? Yeah, you guys totally let that go......(not, that is fun to say)

And.....this cylinder is the product of a decision that Stihl made, not just a defective part.

Blackcatbone putting the beat down on the steal team. :clap:
 
Nope. Not ok at all. But that looks to have been a one time thing.


Fair enuff, now that I set ya up I gotta ask ya. Brad if you had bought that 372 I got and found that screwed up crankcase like I did, hidden just like that cylinder your showing, would you have started a thread entittled Crappy Husky Crankcase-Looks Like ChiCom Garbage, yes or no. If yes then I shall go home, get me some pics of it and start me a good thread too,LOL

(sorry Brad, I couldn't resist)
 
It is only one cylinder.

Could have been the 1rst of the month, and a Monday to boot, training a new casting tech.

Could have been late afternoon on a Friday and the mold casters were in a hurry to fill their quota.

It is only one cylinder.

Ask treeslinger what he's seen in steals cylinders as of late.
 
Interesting...

Chicom junk.....


Interesting that you use that term in the title of a thread about a Stihl cylinder, yet you fail to use that term in your thread about a 361BB cylinder that you got for free, The said BB cylinder have cylindricity problems pointed out by you.

It is so easy for those that have never been involved in manufactring to pass judgement on quality.

Brad, have you confirmed that the cylinder makes measurably less power than a Mahle cylinder, or confirmed with a flowbench that the casting marks cause measurably less flow?

If you were manufacturing saws, would you pour a great deal of capital into a model that will soon be unsellable in your largest market?

Have you stopped to think that maybe Mahle's unit price was to high to keep the MS260 at the price point Stihl needs?

Don't get me wrong, I agree that the appearance is not top level, but it is a tool, not a work of art.

Maybe you should buy the book Stihl: From an Idea to a World Brand to discover some of the obstacles Stihl has overcome to get where they are.

This thread has generated 5 pages in two hours so I would say your main objective is met.

I wonder though, can you define the root cause of the "crappy cylinder"?

What is your short term and long term countermeasure?

Maybe you will do an FMEA?

If I remember correctly, manufacturing is not your field of expertise, so maybe we should view your judgement as that of a layman.


Think about this Brad, You have built yourself a mighty big soapbox here on AS, So you may want to take care with what you say.



John Given


.
 
That's fine also, 3 out of 3 million, is that a good ratio?

:hmm3grin2orange:
I'd say it certainly calls into question the quality control, wouldn't you? What are the chances that those 3 are the only bad ones, considering the nature of the defects?
 
That's fine also, 3 out of 3 million, is that a good ratio?

:hmm3grin2orange:

Close but no cigar, that's 3 that has been exposed out of 40,000,000 plus so far, not bad, what % is that, something like .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003%, not too shabby,:hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange:
 
Close but no cigar, that's 3 that has been exposed out of 40,000,000 plus so far, not bad, what % is that, something like .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003%, not too shabby,:hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange:

Funny, I didn't see you calculating percentages on "drippy." Why is that? :)
 
You forgot timberwolfs thats 2

Don't worry Booker, I'm on the up and up, I included Timbers in my count. Did you include Stihl's 40,000,000 plus sold in you count,LOLOLOL

You make sure to come over to my Husky crankcase thread later on Booker, ya hear, don't be late,LOL


Hot dayummmm I love a thread like this,:hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange:
 
All of the major brands have been cutting corners, sacrificing quality for profit, and shipping units with defective cases, cylinders, pistons, and carburetors for some time now. Mahle has made junk, Gilardoni has made junk, and Tecomec has made junk. It's an undercurrent of modern corporate culture to cost more and produce less.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top