It is disheartening to see someone being shamed for being young and inexperienced. . . . As it stands the only advice he has received is ridicule. . . . Now he is treated like less than human for his skill set, his age, his experience, and his purchase..... That is the shameful part.
That is not an accurate representation of this thread's progress at all.
You are correct that if his only question was, '
how do I identify the correct guide bar for this saw?', he would have received different responses. But, his first post asked for advice and input - this was not something folks just came up on their own, due to a bias against younger posters or to cheap, Chinese saws:
Hi I am very new and young (23 years old) and just started out cutting trees and using a chainsaw a week ago. . . . Please let me know if you need any more information or can give me any haha.
Then he asked about other saws, referenced his inexperience again, and some of his assumptions:
What saw would you recommend if I were to consider buying a name brand? . . . I am currently running a
saw of the same design just a lower spec engine and it runs amazingly well. No issues starting it, plenty of power just a bad bar and chain. I refuse to pay over $200 for a chainsaw that is lower powered just because its name brand. . . . I am not experienced with small engines or rather any engines for that matter . . .
You made some inaccurate assumptions in your first post:
. . .Apparently most of the people didn't read your question past that part.
I read his entire post before responding, looked up the saw he referenced, and spent some time trying to offer him advice. His later posts show that his mind was already set :
To be quite honest there is no name brand saw under $250 that I would even consider buying. They are either made of plastic or under powered. If I am to make such an expensive purchase the tool must be of very high quality and capability.
In other posts he rambles about his first 'Chinese' (his description) saw being a fine saw that '
starts up like a champ! ', but he is returning it anyway; that he does not know how to sharpen a chain, but will buy a larger saw to overcome that; that he just wants it '
to do some yard work or small DIY projects ' with a 60cc saw and a short bar (which he thinks will balance better and cut '
like a hot knife through butter'); that all 'name brand' saws are plastic, under-powered, and die in less than a year; that he is likely to continue to make mistakes and dump them via returns so that he has no responsibility; that cheaper is better; etc., etc., etc. Somewhere, experienced suggestions for spending his $200 better became '$600 saws' (in his mind).
And that we are here to serve him:
If you dont have the answer I need then keep moving.
Your carefully worded, and thoughtful advice was likely wasted. He wanted someone to give him a link to the cheapest, 16" / .058 gauge (?) bar and chain combo that would fit the saw he has not bought (or returned) yet; to give him endless technical support that he will not get from buying a
'non-name brand' saw; and to blame when none of it meets his expectations.
To the OP... The most important number on the bar is the .325, this describes the pitch of the chain which is determined by the sprocket on the saw. Whatever length you choose, make sure the pitch (.325) is the same. Next number is the guage. . . . Truly listen to the advice that has been given about safety. I . . . Do some research on sharpening them there is a ton of information on YouTube. . . .
Likely he has moved on by now, but you might send him a PM and develop your relationship there. If it is posted in these open, public forums, participants will offer their advice and feedback. It is not a concierge service.
There have been many threads here where people have fun, or report positive experiences, with the cheap 'Chinese' and clone saws, such as the returned Earthquakes, the Huztl or FarmerTec 'complete parts kits', etc. Lots of guys who openly admit that they are looking for the lowest cost option. But that is not the trail that the OP left here.
Philbert