stihl ms880 or husqvarna 390xp?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
My brother has an 880 but he runs a sawmill.
That saw is twice as big as my biggest saw , over 120 CC and will accommodate up to a 59" bar.....no way am I lugging it.

If you don't need that monster I'd go with a 390 XP , plenty of saw.
 
Like they said.
880 and 3120 are for milling and rainforrest situations.
For knocking down big trees I would go for a 390 xp.
The 395 is more old school (a lot more weight and not a lot more (.1 kW )power).
If you can even do with .5 kW less you safe yourself a lot of weight and cash with a dolkita 7900.


Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 
Like they said.
880 and 3120 are for milling and rainforrest situations.
For knocking down big trees I would go for a 390 xp.
The 395 is more old school (a lot more weight and not a lot more (.1 kW )power).
If you can even do with .5 kW less you safe yourself a lot of weight and cash with a dolkita 7900.


Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You may not see it on paper but that weight would be probably from a heavier crank, I have both a 390 and the 395 it’s like comparing apples and oranges. The 390/385 will pull a 42 where as the 395 can pull a 60 in Doug fir. My personal preference for everyday falling timber is a 390 but if I know I’m in bigger heavier wood the 395 is the right tool for the job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
@Skeans
You are totally right. Better oiler also.
The 395 is more a small 3120 than a big 390.
It's probably also a regional thing.
In the netherlands or germany there is no actual use for a 395 I think. Not enough power for milling (which nobody (except for us) does anyway).
And if you need to pull more than 40" you are also better of with a 3120.
If it's less than 40" a 390 (or lighter) is so much easier to handle.
And we don't have forrests full of 60"ish trees anyway.
Note; In case someone gave me a 395 I would find a use for it. I've rented it once. It's a beast compaired to my 7900.
 
Agree with others, unless you are planning on primarily milling or cutting old growth redwoods the 390 would be my choice. My big saw is a 394 and unless I’m cutting stuff over 30” in diameter it stays on the shelf.
 
@Skeans
You are totally right. Better oiler also.
The 395 is more a small 3120 than a big 390.
It's probably also a regional thing.
In the netherlands or germany there is no actual use for a 395 I think. Not enough power for milling (which nobody (except for us) does anyway).
And if you need to pull more than 40" you are also better of with a 3120.
If it's less than 40" a 390 (or lighter) is so much easier to handle.
And we don't have forrests full of 60"ish trees anyway.
Note; In case someone gave me a 395 I would find a use for it. I've rented it once. It's a beast compaired to my 7900.

Even over a 40” tree a 390 is fine, I’ve blocked out faces running a 390 in big wood without issues. What I was talking with 42 or 60 is bar length.
6bbab3a7a0f087c8100e95d7c58b1b8d.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Me to. I was talking about 40" bar. 60" tree. I wouldn't put way more on a 390 though. You can, but that doesn't mean you should.
If you had a 390 a 395 and a 3120 and needed a 60" bar. I'm quite sure you wouldn't pick the 390. Only if the 390 was the biggest you had.
Not only because you might ask a bit much from your gear, also because in stock it's hard to find a bigger D009 bar for it [emoji6].
Nice tree BTW. Bit bigger than you'll find overhere.
 
Back
Top