- Joined
- Dec 6, 2014
- Messages
- 21,151
- Reaction score
- 24,990
The ms170 is $179.99 new.
maybe it's the 170, it had a adjustable carbAre you talking about the MS170, or MS171?
Yep... might have been an old 17.You noticed!!!!
It does?Maybe it'
maybe it's the 170, it had a adjustable carb
Nope couldn't have been that either. I think someone was mistaken. I didn like my ms170 much when I first got it either. Now I really enjoy the size and weight. I have a lot of arthritis, bone spurs and back problems from years of heavy weight lifting and the 170 is easy to use. Just wish I had the easy start.Yep... might have been an old 17.
Shoes?I don't use the decomp on any of my saws, but I understand one day I'll be in a different place. Many of the pro saws have decomps and that can help a lot as well as the easy start feature if used correctly.
Heres a video of an 8yr old starting an ms201cm rear handle. Great saw for small limbing that feels much better in hand than a 170/180.
Yeah, can you believe that some people's kids, running around without them .Shoes?
My 94 ranger --still going strong--almost paid off David
Also, Ford Rangers suck.Now that's funny .
BIL has been beating on his bad for many yrs, great truck.
View attachment 696670
When I was into the little trucks I built a bunch of s10's with v-8's in them. Knowing what I learned in that time I would build a ranger(back then instead), the size of the small block fords is great since it's lighter than the small Chevys and the headers for the v-8 swaps are nice. But with all the turbo options out there these days I'd probably opt for a turbo 4 cylinder in either. The dodge was a much bigger truck weight wise, but that 3.9 was a durable little beast in stock form.Also, Ford Rangers suck.
Ls-x FTW!When I was into the little trucks I built a bunch of s10's with v-8's in them. Knowing what I learned in that time I would build a ranger(back then instead), the size of the small block fords is great since it's lighter than the small Chevys and the headers for the v-8 swaps are nice. But with all the turbo options out there these days I'd probably opt for a turbo 4 cylinder in either. The dodge was a much bigger truck weight wise, but that 3.9 was a durable little beast in stock form.
All wheel with a bunch of power sure is fun.Ls-x FTW!
Not a cheap way to go though! Doing an Ls-1 swap into my CJ-7, with an Nv-4500 and it has cost me a lot more $$ than I thought it would... but 350 hp/ 350 lb ft torque - should make all the effort (and money) worth it in the end.
Nothing wrong with that is there, I like them both myself.Dolmarvarna?
Enter your email address to join: