Chainsaw Test Data
- Thread starter Ozhoo
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
US units are converted from metric so there's bound to be some rounding issues. Rev 2, fixed 3 mistakes, added Jred's.
awful knawful
ArboristSite Operative
Nice chart, thanks.
Matt Hogden
ArboristSite Guru
Awesome mate!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I do not believe it. How do you come up with 2.8 for the top handle 193 Stihl. It is the only one dark red didn't you check your math? Or am I missing something. 3.2 divided by 1.3 is 2.4 rounded off to one decimal point I see 2.8 in the chart.
Edit, I see you pulled the number from the with cutting attachment, How many others did you do that with?
On the English system I do not think a Ms250 makes 3.2 hp. My ms 251 I think is 2.9 or maybe 3.0 if you round off in a strange way and I thought it was more powerful. The Husq 555, 560, and 562 all have the same hp on the English system. What is a 335xpt doing in the same chart that has a Stihl 201t?
Can anyone figure out the battery saw test and come up with a hp for it?
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B9wol1YImGY_Q0RIUThWLUh2X0U
Edit, I see you pulled the number from the with cutting attachment, How many others did you do that with?
On the English system I do not think a Ms250 makes 3.2 hp. My ms 251 I think is 2.9 or maybe 3.0 if you round off in a strange way and I thought it was more powerful. The Husq 555, 560, and 562 all have the same hp on the English system. What is a 335xpt doing in the same chart that has a Stihl 201t?
Can anyone figure out the battery saw test and come up with a hp for it?
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B9wol1YImGY_Q0RIUThWLUh2X0U
Well kick me in the balls while you're at it. When you go through that many sheets, you're bound to screw a few up. Thanks for pointing it out.
I'll go through it during out next storm.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2016
- Messages
- 1,815
- Reaction score
- 2,779
Where is my beloved 262XP? Considering it weighs the same as the 254, it should fair well in these tests.
I agree, 262's are sweet and I'd like to see a 395 and 3120 tested.
Previously mentioned mistake was fixed along with 2 others. Also added the Johnny Red's that had been tested.
Good job taking the time to make up the spreadsheet. I still think the winner has not been discovered (Solo 681) but there are many saws out there.....almost too many to mention.
Where's 288XP Lite or a 298?
Oil pump flow rate talk over beers resulted in adding MAX flow rates in ml/min @ 9000RPM and vibrations @ full load. Waiting eagerly for a 572 to be tested.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2014
- Messages
- 21,151
- Reaction score
- 24,987
Has any of this been approved by a German guy?
Have you ever checked Husqvarna 288XP or 2100CD?
No, these test were done by the Board of Trustees for Forestry and Forestry in Germany. I just plugged everything into a table.
Brent Nowell
Addicted to ArboristSite
Lmao!!! Haha
I love the sheets that’s awesome, of course mistakes can be made, don’t sweat it
I appreciate that hard work, gonna print it out!!!As for dickwad some people just don’t appreciate anything no matter how hard you try!
pavel408
ArboristSite Operative
@Ozhoo Very nice table!
For vibrations I'd rather see the average values computed according to ISO 22867 because it takes into account also vibrations with no load (and also enables us to compare real values to those presented by the vendor). DLG writes these ISO-values in newer tests, but for the old tests (e.g. 372xp) one has to compute it. The formula is: sqrt((leerlauf^2 + volllast^2 + vollgas^2)/3)
For vibrations I'd rather see the average values computed according to ISO 22867 because it takes into account also vibrations with no load (and also enables us to compare real values to those presented by the vendor). DLG writes these ISO-values in newer tests, but for the old tests (e.g. 372xp) one has to compute it. The formula is: sqrt((leerlauf^2 + volllast^2 + vollgas^2)/3)
Thanks! Good info!
SmellyPirateHooker
ArboristSite Guru
No 288xp or 3120.....sad face
Interesting read.
Seems to confirm what me and many others have said about the 346 vs the 353, but what was denied by many.
Doubt the vibes chart is without fault on many(not that it's the OP's fault, but maybe, or the testing), I cant see a 365 being smoother than a 576 and smoother than the 372 even though there are different mounts you can get for them they still aren't that smooth.
Nice to see the oil outputs as well, maybe a chart for how often you have to clean the filters
.
Seems to confirm what me and many others have said about the 346 vs the 353, but what was denied by many.
Doubt the vibes chart is without fault on many(not that it's the OP's fault, but maybe, or the testing), I cant see a 365 being smoother than a 576 and smoother than the 372 even though there are different mounts you can get for them they still aren't that smooth.
Nice to see the oil outputs as well, maybe a chart for how often you have to clean the filters
.Similar threads
