Im not trying to be ignorant.............Its just common sense!!!! & to create another Cert for a tree over 30 inches is just as bad as AA using his lawn mower! Wouldnt a removal permit & a city arborist/tree warden be just as effective?
Who is gonna teach this course? & you want me to believe that some one in the Biz for 25yrs or more doesnt have the ability to properly assess a trees risk?..........Bunk I say & this is where things are just getting absolutely ridiculous.........First it was a CA...Now its a BMCA......Now a Tree risk Assessor........does anyone recall a thread years ago where I said "why dont they just create a galactic arborist certification?" Cause pretty soon you will need so many Certs that one of two things are gonna happen: 1-your hourly wage will continue to go down due to paying for multiiple certs/licenses along with acquiring less work, 2- in this economy you will not make up the difference cuz people can barely afford the rates now & they will just let their trees go!
I cant imagine...............sorry Ma`am your tree is 30.25 inches & this requires a certified tree risk assessor... LMFAO, on top of that ma`am you will need a permit, you will have to replant a tree to make up for the loss......oh, powerlines over head, you will need a Line clearance qualified person.....................eh, should only cost tween 3-4 thousand for your 30 ft norway removal...do you want the wood?
LXT...................