B_Turner
Addicted to ArboristSite
I have always thought that the Husky specs on the oiler hole for bars seemed very small compared to Stihl. It's not just a Oregon thing, as my Cannon bars for my Huskies are pretty much the same small hole.
It is generally not too much a problem, but sometimes with long bars and cutting big stumps to the ground it becames more a problem. (Because cutting horizontally deep in the flare involves alot of fiber cutting that is not crosscut - so more small shavings mixed in with the big chips).
A couple days ago I was flushcutting a 68 inch fir stump with my 3120 and 50 inch Cannon bar and was having a little more plugging problem than usual. (Even on the Cannon 50 inch bar the hole is the same tiny sucker on the Husky bar whereas on my 50 inch Cannon bar for my 880 it has two HUGE oil holes...)
So I am toying with the idea of enlarging the hole on my long Cannon bar Husky bar.
So here's my question: Has anyone actually drilled out the oiler hole for a Husky sized hole, and is there any drawback?
Seems like the engineers had the idea that the smaller sized hole delivered oil better....
It is generally not too much a problem, but sometimes with long bars and cutting big stumps to the ground it becames more a problem. (Because cutting horizontally deep in the flare involves alot of fiber cutting that is not crosscut - so more small shavings mixed in with the big chips).
A couple days ago I was flushcutting a 68 inch fir stump with my 3120 and 50 inch Cannon bar and was having a little more plugging problem than usual. (Even on the Cannon 50 inch bar the hole is the same tiny sucker on the Husky bar whereas on my 50 inch Cannon bar for my 880 it has two HUGE oil holes...)
So I am toying with the idea of enlarging the hole on my long Cannon bar Husky bar.
So here's my question: Has anyone actually drilled out the oiler hole for a Husky sized hole, and is there any drawback?
Seems like the engineers had the idea that the smaller sized hole delivered oil better....
Last edited: