Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tree Care Forums
Firewood, Heating and Wood Burning Equipment
cable vrs grapple for firewood business
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Arborist Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nathon918" data-source="post: 4712166" data-attributes="member: 86827"><p>ok well, lets say he keeps the 540, rebuilds it, and hires someone to choke logs/pull cable/ stand around, with only increasing production <5% where exactly would the $40K+ of yearly increased overhead come from???</p><p>now he has hired a buncher, but that increases production 30%+ and thats paid for in time savings, so that makes sense.</p><p>so tell me how a one time $30-40k skidder thats in better shape, can pull more wood and do it faster, would be a bad choice?</p><p> </p><p>even if he didnt run it to its full potential (not increasing production) it would still be money well spent, to not be burnt out all the time!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nathon918, post: 4712166, member: 86827"] ok well, lets say he keeps the 540, rebuilds it, and hires someone to choke logs/pull cable/ stand around, with only increasing production <5% where exactly would the $40K+ of yearly increased overhead come from??? now he has hired a buncher, but that increases production 30%+ and thats paid for in time savings, so that makes sense. so tell me how a one time $30-40k skidder thats in better shape, can pull more wood and do it faster, would be a bad choice? even if he didnt run it to its full potential (not increasing production) it would still be money well spent, to not be burnt out all the time! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top