so your saying that it dose not help with keeping higher compression
Correct. Two ring is a EPA insurance policy. Only 10 fewer carbon molecules discharged with a two ring setup. LOL
Last edited:
so your saying that it dose not help with keeping higher compression
It's definitely harder to clean up a cylinder that's been strait gassed on a 2 ring setup. For whatever reason they seem to make more mess on the exhaust side and also there is usually two nice long scores in line with the ring gaps on the intake side. Most of the single ring strait gas victims I've seen, the intake side has been pretty clean.
It's definitely harder to clean up a cylinder that's been strait gassed on a 2 ring setup. For whatever reason they seem to make more mess on the exhaust side and also there is usually two nice long scores in line with the ring gaps on the intake side. Most of the single ring strait gas victims I've seen, the intake side has been pretty clean.
More steel=more smear I guess.
I've seen single-ring saws like 272s smear just about the entire top of the piston onto the cylinder walls. It all depends on how long the operator runs it with the compromised condition.
Piston residue is usually what you see on the cylinder wall, not ring residue. Pistons are an alloy as you know, silicon/tin/aluminum/other trace elements. I've seen pistons with a higher silicon content smear less material onto the cylinder wall in a lean or straight gas condition but they're more likely to damage the plating as well.
My question is, anytime one of these threads pops up, someone says "Oh yah, it's EPA stuff." Then why was Stihl putting two-ring pistons in their saws 20 years before the EPA even existed? Why did Mall put three and four ring pistons in their saws starting in the mid-30's? Why did Homelite put three-ring pistons in the 26LCS, 7-29, and 8-29? How come the Contra, Contra Lightning, Contra Super, and 090 have always had two-ring pistons?
Correct. Two ring is a EPA insurance policy. Only 10 fewer carbon molecules discharged with a two ring setup. LOL
I've seen single-ring saws like 272s smear just about the entire top of the piston onto the cylinder walls. It all depends on how long the operator runs it with the compromised condition.
Key word here. LOL A funny
Not trying to be a smart :censored: in any way, but most strait gas victims I've seen ran until they stopped themselves.
One ringers are easier to start
I've tested a saw with and without the bottom ring and it makes almost no difference at all. I'm taking maybe 5 psi or less. I just built a 460. It had a simple .035" popup piston, a single new ring, and still made 212 psi on a SnapOn gauge.
So here it is. Dual ring vs. single ring vs. dual ring running one ring. Name your poison and why.
I prefer single rings. If I have a choice I'll take a dual ring and run the upper as it tends to be thinner than a standard single ring piston. What does that stupid 2nd ring do anyway?
If 2 are present which wears faster?
Where does it wear the fastest?
Where does worn piston ring material go?
Why are the 2 ring locators not in the same postion?
Partner ran singles in chainsaws and doubles in cutoff saws, why?
What brands currently run singles in premuim priced "pro" saws?
I've tested a saw with and without the bottom ring and it makes almost no difference at all. I'm taking maybe 5 psi or less. I just built a 460. It had a simple .035" popup piston, a single new ring, and still made 212 psi on a SnapOn gauge.
I'm guessing that was on a newer ring/piston cylinder replacement deal. If its 5psi when new, wouldn't it lead one to believe that when the saw has many years of use on it, that the difference would be higher, and therefore if there is just maybe a minor speed difference when cookie cutting lets say 1 second faster, the two ring setup would delay potential for a re-ring for sometime, possibly years?
Sam
Enter your email address to join: