see the blog post below:
Where increasing habitat for saproxylic insects is the objective, extra wounding is specified. See slides 10-11 of this excellent presentation, as presented to the European Parliament. If the overriding objectives are tree structure and health, cuts would instead be kept small, and more dynamic mass conserved.
Despite traditionalist efforts in the US to confuse the subject, and discredit retrenchment pruning, it does NOT involve extra wounding that is not specified. It’s all in the objective. O and…how can we get the US Congress to take the time to hear about trees and their care?
http://www.historictreecare.com/veteran-tree-retrenchment-for-habitat/
Where increasing habitat for saproxylic insects is the objective, extra wounding is specified. See slides 10-11 of this excellent presentation, as presented to the European Parliament. If the overriding objectives are tree structure and health, cuts would instead be kept small, and more dynamic mass conserved.
Despite traditionalist efforts in the US to confuse the subject, and discredit retrenchment pruning, it does NOT involve extra wounding that is not specified. It’s all in the objective. O and…how can we get the US Congress to take the time to hear about trees and their care?
http://www.historictreecare.com/veteran-tree-retrenchment-for-habitat/