brenndatomu
Hey you woodchucks, quit chucking my wood!
I hear an Owl...Who?? Who's that?? Who??
*
I hear an Owl...Who?? Who's that?? Who??
*
I think the takeaway from all this discussion is that it's really not that cool to pollute our environment, whether it be air, soil or water.Oh yeah, I forgot this...
"Under Proposed Step 2, manufacturers would be required to show compliance testing with cord wood.
We are also proposing to revise the test methods to require the addition of 1-hour filters for each test run to gather data regarding startup and anticipated peaks. Further, we
are proposing new compliance requirements for Step 2 with emissions limits at the lowest burn rate (Category 1) and the maximum burn rate (Category 4), not a weighted average of the four burn rates, as in the current 1988 NSPS."
Chances become very real that "adjustable burn rate" wood-fired appliances will become very difficult to find... especially in "larger" sizes... and you can be sure they won't be cheap. It will be very difficult to make an "adjustable" appliance that can pass testing at both extreme ends of the firing rates... much easier to make a "single burn rate" stove that passes. Likely the ability of the user to "crank it up" when he's cold, and "damp it down" for overnight burns will be gone... basically just on or off will be the options.
So, Del_, as you see by reading my last two posts... there ain't a single stove manufactured today that is guaranteed to pass the new standards. Some may be able to... but there ain't any way possible to use the old testing procedures to predict anything. The simple fact is... nobody friggin' knows.
*
Hey, I'll give Spidey the credit he's due here, he's been doing his homework and sharing the cliff notes with all of us, any of the rest of y'alls actually read through this crap?
Apparently I need to clarify..."This crap" referring to the latest EPA novel crapI read some of his postings.
Using the Lord's name in vain will earn you scorn from the bible belters.....................et al.
Using the Lord's name in vain will earn you scorn from the bible belters.....................et al.
Using the Lord's name in vain will earn you scorn from the bible belters.....................et al.
You read government websites then bash the science that our government often supports? Seems logical to me. I mean I wouldn't want only one side of things being presented whether I form my own opinions or not.Jesus Christ Del_,
Why is it when someone presents you with actual facts... even the actual verbatim of facts... that differ with your perceived notions, you revert to character assassination of the presenter. I didn't make that stuff up, those are direct quotes from the proposed rules.
I've read the complete thing twice, all 354 pages, and skimmed through it several other times... have you even looked at it??
Sure, I added my personal opinions on what they mean, or could possibly mean... but that don't make the verbatim facts any less factual.
Maybe you'd like to hear my opinion of the Constitutionality of it?? I can guarantee you won't like those facts I present...
Listen, I read a lot of things... I read Senate and House bills being voted on, both Federal and State... I read all sorts of proposals from all sorts of regulatory bodies... I monitor the SCOTUS website intently. I don't get my news from TV, papers, radio, talking heads, and certainly not from "special interest" groups... I haven't even looked at a TV in weeks, and I ain't read a newspaper in years. I go directly to government websites, download the latest, friggin' read it, and form my own opinions... and I do it nearly every friggin' day.
As a citizen of these United States I believe it's my duty to be informed, I learned long ago that I'll never be informed by media such as TV, radio, papers and whatnot... but it appears you believe it's your duty to discredit anyone who is truly informed.
I feel sorry for you... it must be a miserable existence.
*
You know my post was tongue and cheek right? I'm a GD pagan Norseman!!!That's not taking the Lord's name in vain... but you may have been taught it is.
Read this...
http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/bl...t-really-mean-to-take-the-lords-name-in-vein/
*
You know my post was tongue and cheek right? I'm a GD pagan Norseman!!!
You read government websites then bash the science that our government often supports? Seems logical to me. I mean I wouldn't want only one side of things being presented whether I form my own opinions or not.
Btw not that you'd care but you did take the Lords name in vain according to scripture
I guess I'm making a statement about a stove being unsafe in the same context as when some on here make a blanket statement that new stoves are no good.
Apparently you are running out of wind, you've started with the personal stuff and are getting all huffy.
Enter your email address to join: