ms241/261 power

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Butzer

Butzer

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
14
Location
Chathamkent
I think its time for a new saw. I have a 100' roll of 72lpx for my ms461 and was hoping to use the same chain on a smaller saw for sharpening convinience. Plus I have a lot of different size 3/8 .050 bars for the 461 already. Will the ms 241/261 pull this chain For 12" trees and under? Maybe This setup wouldn't even fit on the ms241/261. I would prefer the ms 241 for the weight and its on sale right now.
Has anyone done this?
 
AKDoug

AKDoug

Pro Staff
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
2,474
Location
Alaska
The 241 uses the small pattern 3005 bar vs. the 3003 pattern on the 261. They are not interchangeable. They do not offer a standard 3/8 pitch bar in the 3005 patter, just 3/8 picco (low profile) and .325.

The 261 shares the same bar pattern with your 461 and can happily turn 3/8 chain with a 16" bar in hardwood and 20" in softwood.
 
AKDoug

AKDoug

Pro Staff
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
2,474
Location
Alaska
.325" pitch chain on an ms261 is faster/smoother in the cut and faster/easier to sharpen.
I'd agree with the faster/smooter cut, but not faster easier to sharpen. I find it the same level of difficulty to sharpen, but with more 10% more teeth to sharpen per bar length, it certainly isn't faster to sharpen .325.
 
SawTroll

SawTroll

Information Collector
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
64,856
Location
Troms, North Norway
Been happy with the 261/.325. It's got slightly more torque and better sideways balance than my 550. :innocent: Hello Sawtroll

The 261 just isn't what a 50cc saw should be, mainly because of bulk and handling - but not everyone seem to care.

An inboard clutch is a major mistake on a 50cc saw, putting the bar too far out on the side. ;)
 
lone wolf
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
71,971
Location
Prowling The Pine Barrens
Been happy with the 261/.325. It's got slightly more torque and better sideways balance than my 550. :innocent: Hello Sawtroll
I have 241 a 261 and a 346. The 261 has better torque blocking the 346 is more agile ,but i tell you what I like the 241 better then all. It is very agile , light and accurate. The smaller chain is what makes it more controllable in really tight spots.
 
srb08

srb08

Doesn't play well with others
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
3,066
Location
Mid Mo
The 261 just isn't what a 50cc saw should be, mainly because of bulk and handling - but not everyone seem to care.

An inboard clutch is a major mistake on a 50cc saw, putting the bar too far out on the side. ;)

If the balance is correct on the 550 and incorrect on the 261, why does the 550 need a kick stand and the 261 does not?
I would think the better balanced saw would be more stable when sitting on a flat surface.
Not trying to be argumentative, just curious.
 
SawTroll

SawTroll

Information Collector
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
64,856
Location
Troms, North Norway
If the balance is correct on the 550 and incorrect on the 261, why does the 550 need a kick stand and the 261 does not?
I would think the better balanced saw would be more stable when sitting on a flat surface.
Not trying to be argumentative, just curious.

It is about balance in the hands, not on the ground, and it helps to have the bar as close to te center of gravity as possible - think of handling a sword vs. a brick.
 
Butzer

Butzer

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
14
Location
Chathamkent
I guess the 241 is out. For those who have both 241 and 261 can you notice the 1 pound difference? I would guess not really.
Red97 what was it that you didn't like with the 3/8 chain?
 
Top