Got a mm'd 261 on the way back from blsnelling, should be here today. Man I can't wait, I get Tuesday, Wednesdays off and I got a pile of red oak waiting to get blocked up. But to the original poster, I would wait for the 261 c-m. Especially if your not running your saw for a living. Nothing against the regular 261 though,, good saw there.
Is there going to be a way to adjust these saws to richen them up? How about repairs down the road. I just hate being the guinea pig for stihl. Their older technology just seems to be so good.
The M-tronic "computer controlled carb" should run the saw at optimum "carb" settings at all times. Will it hold up down the road??? Good question there...the 441 c-m seems to be holding up so far from what I know. But this is why I gather most loggers/fellers prefer the older adjustable carb, it's been proven and would be easier to work on in the field if something did come up.
Everyone on here talks about how the saws run lean from the factory bad for life of saw but good for the EPA. Why would these saws be any different? If you cant change the carburetor settings then I am assuming that is bad.
I'm quite happy with M-Tronic, and wish they applied it to more products in their line. No primers, no two position choke, and no worrying if your saw is rich enough.
If you're that worried about the EPA trashing your new M-Tronic or AutoTune saw, just buy something else.
On the auto tune or Mtronic it should just tune itself to optimum settings so no need to worry about it being to lean or richening it up
I think the biggest drawback to 3/8 on a 50cc saw is the much larger diameter rim sprocket that must be used. I tried 3/8 on my MS260 PRO for a short time, but then went back to .325. The 3/8 required a light touch to keep in the power band. I guess Husqy guys are probably used to that though...
Enter your email address to join: