MacLaren
Addicted to ArboristSite
Ported that is.
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
Are you saying a ported 372xpw will be stronger than a ported390 xp ?oke:Ported that is.
Are you saying a ported 372xpw will be stronger than a ported390 xp ?oke:
Are you saying a ported 372xpw will be stronger than a ported390 xp ?oke:
Pretty much! call me crazy but yeah!
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
Yeah, your crazy... But isn't everybody?:msp_smile:
No seriously There is no comparison between a 372 and a 385, let alone a 390. A raced up 372 might be able to come close to a 390 if the bars are kept short, but thats it. 390's are hotter stock, and they're like 20cc bigger and I'm pretty sure they're newer technology.
Oh and correct me if I'm wrong but XP means pro, W means full wrap handle, and G means heated grips right?
I know you can get pretty much any XP as an XPW.
Does the W get you more power?
Yeah, your crazy... But isn't everybody?:msp_smile:
No seriously There is no comparison between a 372 and a 385, let alone a 390. A raced up 372 might be able to come close to a 390 if the bars are kept short, but thats it. 390's are hotter stock, and they're like 20cc bigger and I'm pretty sure they're newer technology.
Oh and correct me if I'm wrong but XP means pro, W means full wrap handle, and G means heated grips right?
I know you can get pretty much any XP as an XPW.
Does the W get you more power?
I would imagine vid#2 was the 372xpw @ 20.25 and vid#1 the 390xp @21.53
Therefor makin the 372xpw 6% faster than a 390xp with a 30" bar in Im guessin 25" oak?
In the case of the 372, yes. XPdubs were 75cc as opposed to the 70.7cc norm. 357s are extremely rare as an xpw and I've never seen a 346xpw.
I would imagine vid#2 was the 372xpw @ 20.25 and vid#1 the 390xp @21.53
Yeah, looks like the first one has grip inserts, and the second one doesn't. I'll watch the videos later.
Can't wait to hear the full story:msp_smile:
The saws did have the same chain on them right?:msp_smile:
Seriously thanks for the videos.
But were ALL W's 75 cc's? I 've heard there are actually some w's floating around that aren't. Maybe that's why Andre has felt a difference in the w's he's tested????
Yep same b/c about 10 minutes apart on the videos. The 372 wasn't an xpw either. It was a 71cc version that I entered in the buildoff last spring. I just wanted to see which was faster at the time. That was a couple days before terrys gtg. Both had pins on them. That was full comp square ground with the rakers a little lower than .025".
I think sometime in late 06 early 07 is when the xpw=75cc
Enter your email address to join: