John D
Addicted to ArboristSite
Thanks for the replies. It seems as though both CB and WM owners are happy with their units and only have positive things to say. My local WM dealer stoppeed over today and gave me a concrete price for unit, parts, and installation. My CB dealer is doing the same tomorrow.
I have two questions that I am looking for help on. The first one is that the CB literature says that their units use 25% to 70% less wood than other brands. Does anybody have any "real" evidence if this is true or not? For instance do you have a CB and a neighbor have a WM or vice versa with similiar sized and insulated houses burning similiar types of wood to really get a feel on wood consumption between CB and WM?
My other question involves the water capacity of the CB and WM. The CB dealer told me that the 5036 is "rated" for 3000 square feet while holding 196 gallons of water and the 6048 is "rated" for 6000 square feet while holding 393 gallons of water. The WM dealer told me that the 4400 is "rated" for 5000 square feet but only holds 117 gallons of water. According to this data the 4400 heats with a much lower ratio of water to square footage. How does the WM do this and is it "good or bad?" What are the pros and cons to more/less water? Thanks
The WM cant heat as much with less water,and yes it is bad to have less water capacity,since it is your storage system,you want the ability to store more heat at a time.This is just my opinion,your crazy if you go with the WM,your getting so much more with the CB,you will enjoy longer burn times,and less need to load it based on the water capacity alone.It holds almost 50% more water.CB also is VERY conservative in there ratings.I have a friend who heats with a 5036 and his house is drafty and older,around 3K sq ft,and it easily heats it.You need to compare the next size up WM to the CB,as the one that holds 117 gallons is much smaller.
I will tell you this, Shaver recommended a 165 for my home,which is 3000 sq ft.even when i put in a colder climate on the computer matching system on there site,it still said a 165. The 165 is rated for 4000sq ft and holds 165 gallons of water.I went with the next larger unit a 250,which is rated for 5500 sq ft,and holds 230 gallons of water.I thought Id be safe with a one size bigger. I talked to 2 different CB dealers,both told me i needed the 6048 which held 393 gallons,both said the 5036 would heat my home,but didnt recommend it as it didnt have enough to give me long burn times,and Id be at the limit. Having now had my Shaver almost 3 months,if i could do it over again,I would have bought the CB6048,it would have been perfect,just like they said.I went with a bigger shaver than they told me i needed,and if i had to buy another shaver,id go 2 sizes bigger,with the 340 just for the water capacity,at 310 gallons.You will never say,boy i wish this OWB was smaller,you cant ever go wrong with a bigger unit that holds more water.