Husqvarna 592xp when's the next drop coming? :)

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Parkerpusher

Parkerpusher

ArboristSite Operative
AS Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
415
Location
Western NC USA
96oz of fuel for the 3yr extension equals $30.

If I never use it and let it roll around in the back for the next 3yrs it is still a fairly cheap warranty extension, If I do use it will only last appx 3 1/2 tanks in the 592 anyways. :surprised3:
Exactly…. Plus it smells terrible when you run it. Did I mention that?😬. I want to go home smelling like wood and sweet 2 stroke, not wood and stank 😂
 
Olebarncat25

Olebarncat25

New Member
Joined
May 26, 2022
Messages
4
Location
13778
My 592 is a total different animal than both my 390 and 395! I production cut hardwood in NY every day with it. Very pleased with the saw, had my doubts at first cause the 572 was garbage. Definitely No complaints
 
Iffykid

Iffykid

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Messages
153
Location
Minnesota
My 592 is a total different animal than both my 390 and 395! I production cut hardwood in NY every day with it. Very pleased with the saw, had my doubts at first cause the 572 was garbage. Definitely No complaints
what was garbage about the 572? I have been considering one to go along with my 592.
 
sean donato

sean donato

Chainsaws are like crack... just can't get enough.
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
8,268
Location
Eastern, PA
I'll second that, I habe a family friend that's a logger here in PA. He loves his 572xp. And he's a life long 372xp guy.
I'm starting to think I need to run one of these 592xp saws. I had my eye on them when husqy first dropped a hint about them, but as an owner of a 390xp and a 394/5xp I find it hard to believe that one saw is lighter then the 390xp but has more power then the 395xp. If so I'll happily sell both saws and get a 592xp....
 
Iffykid

Iffykid

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Messages
153
Location
Minnesota
I'll second that, I habe a family friend that's a logger here in PA. He loves his 572xp. And he's a life long 372xp guy.
I'm starting to think I need to run one of these 592xp saws. I had my eye on them when husqy first dropped a hint about them, but as an owner of a 390xp and a 394/5xp I find it hard to believe that one saw is lighter then the 390xp but has more power then the 395xp. If so I'll happily sell both saws and get a 592xp....
If only what you wrote was the case.
592 is heavier than the 390 but lighter than the 395.
Yes rated HP is higher on the 592 vs the 395
 
Iffykid

Iffykid

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Messages
153
Location
Minnesota
Just making me want to run one more.... illnhave to see if I can find some sort of comparison between all three.
592XP being the first AT Husky I have run it felt kind of wonky in the cut, with a carbed saw I would adjust my cut depending on how the saw was cutting rpm wise. With AT it took awhile for me to adjust to the way the saw cut hard to explain not good not bad just different than what I am used to in a carbed saw be it Stihl or Husky.
 
huskihl

huskihl

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
4,864
Location
Northern Michigan
I'll second that, I habe a family friend that's a logger here in PA. He loves his 572xp. And he's a life long 372xp guy.
I'm starting to think I need to run one of these 592xp saws. I had my eye on them when husqy first dropped a hint about them, but as an owner of a 390xp and a 394/5xp I find it hard to believe that one saw is lighter then the 390xp but has more power then the 395xp. If so I'll happily sell both saws and get a 592xp....
It’s definitely faster than both of those with normal bar lengths. Where the 395 excels is in oiling capacity and ability to run longer bars. The 592 likes to run at say….9-11k rpm. Pull it below that and it falls off. Where the 395 is forgiving from 7-11k.

Rpm numbers are approximate. Just a reference to the attitude of each saw
 
Iffykid

Iffykid

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Messages
153
Location
Minnesota
It’s definitely faster than both of those with normal bar lengths. Where the 395 excels is in oiling capacity and ability to run longer bars. The 592 likes to run at say….9-11k rpm. Pull it below that and it falls off. Where the 395 is forgiving from 7-11k.

Rpm numbers are approximate. Just a reference to the attitude of each saw
I am abnormal :surprised3:and run abnormal bar length on my 592 24" B&C for bucking 20-30"Oak into firewood when buried it does not slow down and goes thru wood the way I was hoping for.:chainsaw::clap:

If everything is averaging less than 24" I switch to a 044 running a 20" bar and chain but considering checking out a 572 but again with 20" bar and chain.

IMG_0005.jpg
 
huskihl

huskihl

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
4,864
Location
Northern Michigan
I am abnormal :surprised3:and run abnormal bar length on my 592 24" B&C for bucking 20-30"Oak into firewood when buried it does not slow down and goes thru wood the way I was hoping for.:chainsaw::clap:

If everything is averaging less than 24" I switch to a 044 running a 20" bar and chain but considering checking out a 572 but again with 20" bar and chain.

View attachment 991107
I was thinking up to 28-32” or so. So still normal lol.
 
Iffykid

Iffykid

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Messages
153
Location
Minnesota
The issue with these samplings is there no consistency in the method of weighing other than using the same scale, the 592 the scale is balancing on what looks like a pickup bed liner and the saw is positioned over one corner of the scale and not centered. The heaviest saw is the 395 which is the only saw that looks like it might be centered on the beam/platform of the scale. Score A for effort C for execution.
 

Latest posts

Top