Is this really necessary? Clutch Cover for 426 and 500i

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
CatMan Fetters

CatMan Fetters

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Messages
179
Location
Fennville Michigan
Skeans

Skeans

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Messages
2,752
Location
Rainier, Or
user 122190
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
7,785
In some ways yes it is, the 500’s and 462 clutch covers suck if you’re a timber caller you’re always getting chips shot at you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is this something you're going to be buying?

Wouldn't it be better and cheaper to buy or make a better/larger chip deflector? I'll make you one and only charge you $80. That will save you about 1/2. Okay?
 
Skeans

Skeans

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Messages
2,752
Location
Rainier, Or
Is this something you're going to be buying?

Wouldn't it be better and cheaper to buy or make a better/larger chip deflector? I'll make you one and only charge you $80. That will save you about 1/2. Okay?

Didn’t say I would be buying one all I said was the chip management is a joke on these saws for falling there’s nothing like getting a face full of chips well using the clutch side to sight in a face. What would be best is the manufactures quit listening to the firewood community and actually focus on the users that made them into what they are now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
user 122190
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
7,785
Okay.... Cause I thought your were saying that this WCS clutch cover was a good product for it's chip deflection. I still say if that is the problem, then buy a better rubber chip deflector.

For what it is worth (I know you find some reason to disagree) I did buy a larger chip deflector for the ms461, and did see an improvement, but there were still chip hitting me. Solution is keep your exposed skin away from the chip exhaust and wear protection (like chaps) if it is still a problem.
 
Woodslasher

Woodslasher

Make McCulloch Great Again!
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Messages
3,963
Location
Commiefornia
Just do what this guy did and save yourself a ton of money. I saw an 056 with this setup too, just get a piece of inner tube or leather, some rivets, and viola! You now have a wide discharge cover!
cb4eb32add6e0f634e1a66decaebc1e5.jpg
 
cookies

cookies

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Nov 26, 2020
Messages
2,357
Location
Crawfordville
In some ways yes it is, the 500’s and 462 clutch covers suck if you’re a timber caller you’re always getting chips shot at you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought there are two versions of cover, the regular and the extended length with longer chip deflector. maybe a chip bagger side cover option is needed?
 
Trailsawyer

Trailsawyer

ArboristSite Operative
AS Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
238
Location
SW Washington
Fallers have been fabricating "extended" chip deflectors ever since the chainsaw was invented! As Skeans stated, there is no question that the clutch covers, even the "R" models, could be improved! If you watch the WCS video, their cover appears to be better at deflecting chips. I'm not ready to buy one yet, but I'll be listening to the reports from those who do!
 
mbrick

mbrick

ArboristSite Guru
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
May 13, 2014
Messages
710
I too wondered what aluminum offered over the original magnesium part.

Also, it should be anodized or powder coated, it looks unfinished. Even tumbled with a clear ano?

And it did need captive nuts.

They say wider, better for chips and stronger. I don't know enough about these Stihl saws to know if that is a market needing improvement.
Props to anyone for designing and bringing a product to market though!
 
K-techcowboy

K-techcowboy

N.A.O.T Racing
Joined
Oct 27, 2021
Messages
357
Location
Oklahoma

Latest posts

Top