sithl 660 or husky 395

[SawTroll]

Is the 372 the only one in the Husky stable that was smart enough to come with the inboard clutch? That is one thing that I feel is a pain with some of the huskies. Don't have the comparison between these, but that would send me towards the Stihl.

385/390 as well, and of course 371, 365, 362, as well as the 372.

 

[SawTroll]

:arg:

Husky 366xp on the way

What is that??

 

[funky sawman]

:arg:

What is that??

A 366 is a husqvarna prototype saw. It will use a 372 bottom end, X-tork piston and cylinder of 66cc. The fuel tank will be the same as the 372 except for a metal strip protector in case the chain comes off. According to my husky rep this saw will be called the "thinners special". THIS IS NO JOKE:jawdrop:

 

[SawTroll]

A 366 is a husqvarna prototype saw. It will use a 372 bottom end, X-tork piston and cylinder of 66cc. The fuel tank will be the same as the 372 except for a metal strip protector in case the chain comes off. According to my husky rep this saw will be called the "thinners special". THIS IS NO JOKE:jawdrop:

Doesn't sound that interesting, power to weight probably will be pretty low.........:censored:

 

[funky sawman]

Doesn't sound that interesting, power to weight probably will be pretty low.........:censored:

The saw will have the same power as th 372 (5.4hp) and only weigh 13.9lb!!

 

[SawTroll]

I believe it when it is out.......

 

[funky sawman]

I believe it when it is out.......

Husky says this saw is going to be the cats meow

 

[chainsaw1]

Husky says this saw is going to be the cats meow

Is that what hey told Home Depot?

 

[Nailsbeats]

I feel the 660 is a little more versatile because it is lighter and handles better for me, that said, the 394/395's cut very strong. I pick up a 660 most of the time.

 

[RiverRat2]

I have owned both and my choice is the 660 .................






still have some 395 parts to unload

Duhhhhhhh!!!!!

 

[Peacock]

I prefer the 394 over the 395 and the 660 over both. It's a MUCH more versatile saw. It makes one hell of a firewood saw when ported with a 20" bar and an 8 pin sprocket.

 

[Banshee]

I prefer the 394 over the 395 and the 660 over both. It's a MUCH more versatile saw. It makes one hell of a firewood saw when ported with a 20" bar and an 8 pin sprocket.

Hey Peacok, How do you like your 009L?

 

[BIGBORE577]

Duhhhhhhh!!!!!

Really, go figure..............

 

[abohac]

Both those saws are great saws. Comes down to brand loyalty. I have a 395 XPG and love the thing. Both are going to set you back about $1100.

 

[Peacock]

Hey Peacok, How do you like your 009L?

It's a small, underpowered top handle. It was dirt cheap and it starts every time. For the price, it's great. Compared to most any other top handle it's underpowered.

If I had it my way, I'd have a 200 or even a 192.

 

[William Balaska]

I had both 660, 395. I also now have a 2100cd. I prefer the 660 over all of them and am still running it today, I also still have the 2100cd strong saw, I wish the 660 had a manual oiler