2nd growth redwood

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

forestryworks

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Mar 30, 2007
Messages
3,927
Reaction score
500
Location
No
is it me or does this thing "fall slow?" maybe it's cause the cam moves with the tree as it falls...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHpeSfSURo

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lbHpeSfSURo&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lbHpeSfSURo&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
Yea, it looked slow... Take it that it had no lean what so ever????
I hate it when they sit there and balance....
 
Looked okay to me. Watch the tip and not the whole tree. The camera angle makes it seem slow but the tip speed looked pretty normal.

And bullbuck is right...you can slam dunk a second growth like that but an old growth would have gone to pieces on you.
 
Most of the second growth I'm working in has heart rot and would have slabbed or exploded when it hit that stump. I am not too impressed with any second growth redwood. It rots too easily and gets buggy fast. Doesn't last in the ground like old growth.
 
From a saw miller’s point of view, hitting that stump done more damage then what it appeared to have done. Cracks = chips, not lumber. Either shorten the stump or lay it down beside the stump, and allow the tree to fall nice and slow. With all of the cedars, including redwood, you know as well as I do how prone they are to cracking. Therefore, extra care has to be taken in all aspects of handling of them to avoid ruining a nice log. If it is just going to get trashed before it gets made into a usable product it may as well be left standing.
 
Man he nailed that stump!

that would have enielated a poplar of that stature,(east coast).

it sucks that the second growth dosent have the amazing properties that the old stuff has.

Grandpa & I chipped abunch of old redwood siding of an old homestead that he said was built in the late 1800's.

It had been sitting in the vacant lot next to my Great g-parents house in the elements since the 40's, besides alittle bleaching it was sound as cement.

THAT STUFF IS T,T,TOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Man he nailed that stump!

that would have enielated a poplar of that stature,(east coast).

it sucks that the second growth dosent have the amazing properties that the old stuff has.

Grandpa & I chipped abunch of old redwood siding of an old homestead that he said was built in the late 1800's.

It had been sitting in the vacant lot next to my Great g-parents house in the elements since the 40's, besides alittle bleaching it was sound as cement.

THAT STUFF IS T,T,TOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!

Next time put it on ebay or CL. Old growth has dollar value!
 
Worked in Humboldt for four years, and fell a lot of timber like that, and I thought that was a dang good save:clap: Imho, second growth redwood is actually quite brittle, as is old growth; I think the difference is that old growth is a LOT more dense, and therefor heavier, so it hits the ground harder. I think he was actually trying to go for that stump to get the butt up in the air. If you look, that stump has been cut off at an angle so that it would glance off once the butt of the redwood was in the air. It looked like he scarfed his undercut to hold the butt on it's stump until it hit the other stump. The reason being for this it is that redwoods carry most of their weight in the butts so if that butt would have came off the stump it would have surely broke because the ground is so low directly in front of the stump, but he kept it on the stump and if he would not of used that other stump for some elevation the redwood might have had belly, which is BAD for a redwood...Belly=big ripped up slabs, and getting your :censored: chewed by the bullbuck. At least that is what I see in the vid? That guy has skills imao:cheers:
 
Last edited:
Second growth Redwoods are by volume, about half sticks, yep a pole covered with small limbs. Beat you black and blue, from the elbows down. In certain seasons, infested with ticks. Blah
 
Worked in Humboldt for four years, and fell a lot of timber like that, and I thought that was a dang good save:clap: Imho, second growth redwood is actually quite brittle, as is old growth; I think the difference is that old growth is a LOT more dense, and therefor heavier, so it hits the ground harder. I think he was actually trying to go for that stump to get the butt up in the air. If you look, that stump has been cut off at an angle so that it would glance off once the butt of the redwood was in the air. It looked like he scarfed his undercut to hold the butt on it's stump until it hit the other stump. The reason being for this it is that redwoods carry most of their weight in the butts so if that butt would have came off the stump it would have surely broke because the ground is so low directly in front of the stump, but he kept it on the stump and if he would not of used that other stump for some elevation the redwood might have had belly, which is BAD for a redwood...Belly=big ripped up slabs, and getting your :censored: chewed by the bullbuck. At least that is what I see in the vid? That guy has skills imao:cheers:


I never would have thought of that. Just shows what me skill level is!
 
Back
Top