edrrt
ArboristSite Operative
Greetings.
Shipped to my door I can get the Iron and Oak 26 ton Honda or the Northern Tool 37 ton splitter for the same price (about 2,300). I could also get the I&O delivered for $350 less with a Subaru robin engine.
I really like the extra features the Northstar comes with like the garage stripper for the wedge, idle down and log cradles for the beam. I was all set to get one until I started hearing about the leaking return hose issue. Now it seems northern has stated the system can not have a hydro filter and if you install one yourself you void the warranty. Even with the filter removed on the new system people are still posting about failing return hoses. Seems to me there is some kind of serious design problem here and while removing the filter may help it does not seem to be a true fix. Then as others mentioned there is also the problem that you can't actualy use the garage to strip stuck logs off because they will hit the engine, again design issue. Some have also comented the build of the undercairage is poor as well.
I am most worried about the problems NT seems to be dancing around with the plumbing and return line failures. So I started looking around at other splitters and found the 26T I&O for the same price.
Its less tonage than the Northern but some say the northern is over rated and after looking at the specs I suspect the I&O may be pretty close in terms of performance. The I&O is a VERY basic design, although it does cycle in 12 seconds which is very fast. I really liked the idle down feature offered by the northern as my previous lickety splitter did this and I loved it.
I only split about 4 cords per year but they are giant old tree's at the ends of their life spans in a windy area so the wood is very twisty and tough to split. Bay, euc, and oaks.
Should I go with the more basic I&O or am I being parinoid about the Northern. Is the Honda worth the extra $350?
I want something that will work without problems for the next 50 years.
Bells and whistles Northstar or basic I&O?
Thoughts?
Shipped to my door I can get the Iron and Oak 26 ton Honda or the Northern Tool 37 ton splitter for the same price (about 2,300). I could also get the I&O delivered for $350 less with a Subaru robin engine.
I really like the extra features the Northstar comes with like the garage stripper for the wedge, idle down and log cradles for the beam. I was all set to get one until I started hearing about the leaking return hose issue. Now it seems northern has stated the system can not have a hydro filter and if you install one yourself you void the warranty. Even with the filter removed on the new system people are still posting about failing return hoses. Seems to me there is some kind of serious design problem here and while removing the filter may help it does not seem to be a true fix. Then as others mentioned there is also the problem that you can't actualy use the garage to strip stuck logs off because they will hit the engine, again design issue. Some have also comented the build of the undercairage is poor as well.
I am most worried about the problems NT seems to be dancing around with the plumbing and return line failures. So I started looking around at other splitters and found the 26T I&O for the same price.
Its less tonage than the Northern but some say the northern is over rated and after looking at the specs I suspect the I&O may be pretty close in terms of performance. The I&O is a VERY basic design, although it does cycle in 12 seconds which is very fast. I really liked the idle down feature offered by the northern as my previous lickety splitter did this and I loved it.
I only split about 4 cords per year but they are giant old tree's at the ends of their life spans in a windy area so the wood is very twisty and tough to split. Bay, euc, and oaks.
Should I go with the more basic I&O or am I being parinoid about the Northern. Is the Honda worth the extra $350?
I want something that will work without problems for the next 50 years.
Bells and whistles Northstar or basic I&O?
Thoughts?