Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Equipment Forums
Large Equipment
Anyone ever deal with Salsco Products
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Arborist Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thor&#039;s Hammer" data-source="post: 317477" data-attributes="member: 6434"><p>Dan, the 12'' discone will chip 15'' no problem. to prove it, tom and earl, the company owners, took me out with the DC 50 and put a 14'' piece of oak that took 5 men to lift- straight through no probs. I video'd them doing it, and that machine was sold.</p><p>The 565 I'm having is a conehead chiper too. the discone is just cheaper to manufacture than the two cone design, and yes there is a bigger discone coming. the difference with the 2 cone design is the huge cutting width. the 565 i'm having will cut 34'' wide...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thor's Hammer, post: 317477, member: 6434"] Dan, the 12'' discone will chip 15'' no problem. to prove it, tom and earl, the company owners, took me out with the DC 50 and put a 14'' piece of oak that took 5 men to lift- straight through no probs. I video'd them doing it, and that machine was sold. The 565 I'm having is a conehead chiper too. the discone is just cheaper to manufacture than the two cone design, and yes there is a bigger discone coming. the difference with the 2 cone design is the huge cutting width. the 565 i'm having will cut 34'' wide... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top