Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's a picture of some cut trees and the chinese saw that cut them.
20180207_111619_hdr-jpg.631207
 
First and foremost this IS NOT about Scott’s, Randy’s, or any other reputable porters abilities, what this saw can and cannot do etc etc. this is about how franks results will be skewed and was always MY ONLY point. I have the utmost respect for all the reputable porters on these sites, NO DIKHEAD this does not include you! When frank shows us his X gain, a big portion of that X is not his to claim.

This video is example of what happened to Scott’s gains when a true test was performed. 40.7 stock 35.5 ported. What happened to those significant gains he had? No they are not gone, they WILL return AS THE SAW BREAKS IN, but they are not his to claim. Those gains can be achieved by anyone simply by running fuel Thru the saw just how dikhead is doing right now which is dikheads #1 mod wether he wants to admit it or not!

Dikhead already fuked up this testing phase to find his TRUE gains, so his only option is AFTER HE IS DONE MAKNG CHANGES, go get a second 462, make one test cut and time it, dip it in the cauldron, make 1 or 2 test cuts and time it, any more than a few cuts are going to start skewing the results again.. Those are HIS gains he could beat his flabby chest with.

If your gonna put your boot in your mouth Frankie, at least tie the laces so u don’t choke on them! Ya really think your better than Scott and randy dikhead? And by that much? By the way, your free pass to adjust your projected outlook for this saw has been rescinded now that julian posted the video. Roflmao!

Just to be clear and not misrepresent myself, I'm a nobody, I specialize in nothing but some people HAVE called me special, some people might even go far as to say both my oars are not in the water, or i'm no sharper than a bowling ball. To be honest, I know very little about this saw and quite frankly don't even understand what the fuk is going on in there. but, i'm good at mathmatics and pyshics 101 eh frankie? When and if Scott @crabby cooter gets this saw figured out, he sure has my bizzness. I've never seen a more honest person on these forums. The ego and possibly lots of money was left at the door posting this after video. Job well done fellas!

Carry on boyz, my job is done here.



 
The 462c is capable of 7.2-7.5 hp IF the guy doing the work is spot on ... I’m talkin .001 or less on ALL needed dimensions ... that’s a STOCK cylinder/squish / combustion chamber ... New saw , let’s see who can hit the home-run shall we ?

Ok, I give up, please enlighten us.
On what could possibly be these 'ALL needed dimensions' that someone would alter, while porting a 462, that would have to be within less than .001" to achieve these gains, or even the slightest bit of additional power?
Waiting for your usual excuse of 'Proprietary info' whenever you have no logical answer to questions about the drivel you randomly spew forth...
Or a music video maybe?

This statement standing by itself shows how utterly clueless you are with regard to modding saws, and many other things for that matter...
You are purely charlatanical...
 
Pay attention to the 462 when red bull posts the after video of the 462vs461 in the saw video thread. Remember crabbys gains with the original 462 in his build thread? I don’t recall exact numbers, but they were in the 25-30% range I believe. Watch them drastically drop with this second saw if the after vid is honestly reported. Those gains will return with runtime but Why were those gains lost, and who should take credit for them? I’m putting myself out there and say you will see at least a 15% drop in gains. I will take this even further, his 1st cut with the new never run stock 462 was 40.7 his 1st cut with the new 462 with only 1 cut on it after porting will be no better than 35 seconds if the saw actually only has one cut on it, and that time is giving him alot of credit. im going to be arogant and say I guarantee im not wrong IF an honest video is posted @redbull660
Not to sound like a pompous azz but I could break down dikheads mods and tell him exactly what each thing he did to the saw gained him, down to probably .25%. I won’t give him the fukin time of day or help him fraud people in any way! I will give y’all a hint though, it’s next to nothing. You wanna know what I see frankie when I look at your description under your name and see "241c-362c, 660 specialist? Fake gains, Fake gains, Fake gains, and one more time......fake gains! If i were you i wood remove that fukin bullchit and look up the words humility and humble and read said definitions over and over till they sunk in to that fukin pea brain you got in that skull of yours.

Now think frank how did I predict Scott’s time within .5 seconds with what I had available to me in the first vid and his build thread? How the fuk did that happen! Get on your fancy fancy puter program that shows you “.001 of all dimensions” And tell me how the fuk I did that? I was going to say 35.5 and wood have been dead nuts on, but I wanted to give myself some wiggle room with how many cuts I thought they were going to make. HOW THE FUK IS THIS POSSIBLE TO COME UP WITH THESE TIMES! weird eh?

I could do this with your build too, but it would be difficult. You know why frank? Because your dishonest, that’s why frank. Also your saw skillz suck! I’ve never seen such rookie testing videos in my life! How could one pull accurate information from those videos? Study them and think what your doing dikhead!

THE ONLY POSSIBLE WAY TO DO R&D PROPERLY IS TO BREAK IN THE SAW COMPLETELY BEFORE YOU EVEN PULL THE ENGINE COVER! I’m talking GALLONS AND GALLONS of fuel or till no further gains are seen. This way you know what’s yours and what’s not. Anyone claiming 30% or more with this saw anytime soon and not showing an honest before and after video like Scott and Julian did is full of **** in my book.
FUK U JIZZO AND @Del_

fokker OUT
 
Not Stihl saws & not ported but the current run of fallers saws we have the "defaultish"setting (want of a better term is North of 35 tanks of fuel for the best results )Bit stange as well that a porter of repute would quote clearance sizes rather than refer to the build as blueprinted in regard to dimensions
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top