When I lived in South Dakota (Black Hills), I had several guys tell me that lightning struck trees did not burn well. I never had the chance to test this , but cant understand the reason or science behind this. Anyone else ever hear of this?
Ron
I have been burning almost daily (and about to go out light it off again) lightning struck red oak small branch wood. I use that to get green privet going from around the yard, trims. The lightning struck fallen branches are ready to rock as they fall from the tree. Stacking the one inch and larger stuff, but I burned a few whole, up to six inch diameter, just to check them out.
I would say the opposite, lightning struck is better than normal wood! The moisture done got electrolyzed right out of it!
A lot of tarded old timers are just full of it,. I call it hoop snake junk science. Flat earthers. Repeat some drivel they heard from some other tard decades agom, but because they are old guys it is supposed to be gospel and pure science. Nuts.
Sometimes they are right, a lot of times, wrong. Human beings, some speak from experience, others speak from gossip.
Here's one, you can't burn pine inside, you will burn your house down, creosote! One stick, OMG!!!!
Tell them other areas of the planet, all they can get is pine, and they don't have any trouble..they stare at you.....deer in the headlights stare..they want to argue, but never thought about it that way..but..but..granpappy told them so!!
ya, and granpappy hit the shine jug hard all the time, too...
Same people will burn oak cut late spring and not even split until like november, right when they need it small enough to stuff in the stove. That's called "seasoned" around here.
Nuts.
The only old guy junk I have to pass on as some sort of alleged wisdom is sweet talk wimminks and animals, and cuss machinery.
But sometimes you need it backwards from that...ya never know..
And most of the time, it is better to just shut up, and use facial expressions and body language.
Except on the net.....