Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Terms and Rules
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tree Care Forums
Firewood, Heating and Wood Burning Equipment
Firewood Measurement: Legal definitions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Arborist Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dalmatian90" data-source="post: 4155715" data-attributes="member: 28208"><p>If there is one, I'd suspect you'd find it in a case involving Measurers of Wood. </p><p></p><p>I would suspect there isn't legal precedent on it because you have two items -- one is completely objective (a measurement of volume), the second is completely subjective ("compact"). The entire point to being public Measurers of Wood was to provide a disinterested third party who made, especially in relation to how it was stacked, that subjective judgement as to whether the item offered for sale met the statutory definition of a cord by both volume and quality of stacking.</p><p></p><p>What is a judge going to do other then shrug his shoulders and tell them that the Measurer of Wood was in a much better position at the time the cord was measured then the judge is now to determine whether or not it's a cord.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dalmatian90, post: 4155715, member: 28208"] If there is one, I'd suspect you'd find it in a case involving Measurers of Wood. I would suspect there isn't legal precedent on it because you have two items -- one is completely objective (a measurement of volume), the second is completely subjective ("compact"). The entire point to being public Measurers of Wood was to provide a disinterested third party who made, especially in relation to how it was stacked, that subjective judgement as to whether the item offered for sale met the statutory definition of a cord by both volume and quality of stacking. What is a judge going to do other then shrug his shoulders and tell them that the Measurer of Wood was in a much better position at the time the cord was measured then the judge is now to determine whether or not it's a cord. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top