They burn less fuel and meet the new emissions regs. but how are they doing it , what is the design , is it all in the carb or some mods. to the cylinder .And do they still use a cat. Sorry if I missed this in previous posts .
Last edited:
"X-torque" mainly is a marketing bluff, to sweaten the bitter "pill" of the heavier strato saws - no sign of any extra torque has been found in independent dyno tests!
X-torq is the name for the new engine design, not a marketing bluff, LOL. It's huskies version of a strato engine, copied after the 441.:biggrinbounce2:
X-torq is the name for the new engine design, not a marketing bluff, LOL. It's huskies version of a strato engine, copied after the 441.:biggrinbounce2:
You always forget the parts of the story that you don't like - Husky made "strato" saws long before the 441 came out, and that one has several features that are bluntly copied from Husky saws!
huh? Did red max make the 441?
huh? Did red max make the 441?
The failed 575?
Stihl can't use their patents without paying Husky for it! :biggrinbounce2:
Whats wrong with the 575? any and all issues have been resolved, hence the 576. A few bearing issues, not a biggie, a first run production saw that needed alittle tweaking. Have yet to have a later production 575 come into the shop, other than for owners looking for air filters and bars and chains.
The failed 575?
Enter your email address to join: