Just say no to Chinese bearings?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
EBC is one brand that is common. I use them in easy applications.

If a person is looking at unbranded 6202 or 6203 bearings that come in a bag of 100 for $25.00 retail than no I would not use those. Those are sketchy, I have some of those, they were labeled “Farm Quality”.
 
EBC is one brand that is common. I use them in easy applications.

If a person is looking at unbranded 6202 or 6203 bearings that come in a bag of 100 for $25.00 retail than no I would not use those. Those are sketchy, I have some of those, they were labeled “Farm Quality”.
Quite a few women I'd label the same walking around this place...
 
China is home for the bean counters and start up company's.

+1 for the Nachis for my builds. I'm not going to risk it for the ~$8 saved with China bearings per bottom end re-build. I wouldn't forgo an SKF though, that's OEM. In the environment that I spend my days we use all brands mentioned here (except the FT/Huztl obviously) and I've seen no pattern of failure from any of them.

Agreed. It would be irresponsible to willingly put in a Chinese bearing over a non Chinese manufactured Koyo, Timken, NSK, Nachi, or SKF.

I have to believe their tooling and QC has to be up to snuff to put their name on it, regardless of country of origin.

I'd agree to a point. There is potential for good product if the product is already designed and all the tooling is supplied and paid for by the parent company and they just moved production to China for the bean counter aspect. I don't think QC will be maintained in the long run. Inferior quality is going to get stamped and put in the box no matter what by the 8 year old kid running the machines.

Just because China has the blue print, doesn't mean the QC and specification is adhered to. I've worked in industry where parts come from China. Within the same brand, produced by a reputable company, albeit in China, week to week the parts coming in from China were not consistent and from week to week you'd get tight or loose components, and sometimes you would get spot on - exactly what the blue print likely said in the first place.

The difference between a superior company to an inferior company is how often the piece of crap part goes out the door. As soon as it becomes regular practice you don't know what you're getting, the company is no good. Produced in China, or anywhere in the world.

So, just because it is made in China, doesn't make it a bad product. Even a blind squirrel can find a nut once in awhile.

But I'd almost be willing to guarantee if I bought 100 bearings from Koyo-Japan and 100 bearings from Koyo-Japan-but-produced-in-China(which isn't even a thing...but if it was) then I would likely end up with a lot more PREMIUM quality bearings from Koyo-Japan than what China chose to box and ship, regardless of who's blue prints they looked at.

If Stihl shut down every factory, and moved it all to China. Sent all the tooling there. Here are the blue prints, start hammering out our flagship saws. The raw materials used are inferior, the quality control is inferior, the workers aren't putting in the work(read quality control), corners are getting cut. Things are getting put in boxes marked guaranteed pieces of crap. Within 5 years Stihl is a washed up, over priced, no name company. Only way they'd ever sell a saw again, is if their prices were slashed accordingly and I guarantee no one in professional business of using chainsaws would be buying a Stihl.

Stihl product produced by the parent company in the home country paying top dollar workers, there is less chance a crappy end product gets put in the box and sent. Specifications are more adhered to. If Stihl chose to source out some of the work to China.... as long as when the sub component is received on shore it is inspected before put into service. I'd say nothing wrong with that. Take out the middle man and China is garbage running into the ground. It's cheaper for a reason... Pretty sure quality standards go out the window and things start getting boxed on a whim.

All that being saiddddd........... kinda thinking where company's made their name then outsourced to other country's (think smaller China's...less quality cuts) are the inferior bearings. SKF Argentina is probably inferior to original SKF products. A Nachi bearing NOT made in Japan is going to be inferior to the native Japan Nachi.

A Japanese bearing is probably the best on the market, and I'd say a Koyo Japanese bearing is probably better than the rest of Japanese bearing manufacturers.

Is an SKF Argentina so inferior to a Koyo Japan bearing it wont work? Probably not SKF is still a reputable company, albeit slightly bean countered out by going to Argentina...as long as the bearing isn't hammered out directly out of the box, it should be good to go. Life of the bearing is likely the only consideration. I'm sure they'll both function the same way until failure.

Some basic linear math...not sure if the oiling principle a 2 stroke is linear...but... Chainsaw running for 20 minutes on a half liter of fuel. 15 minutes full throttle 9k RPM, 5 mins idle 3k RPM. In 20 minutes the bearing just did 150,000 revolutions. In half a liter of fuel mixed at 50:1 there is 10ml of oil.

Per minute, that bearing is only seeing .5ml of oil...or less because it's actually distributed throughout the entire bottom end.

That's a whole lot of steel on steel getting spun around with very little lubrication. I want the best bearing made of the best raw materials, produced to exacting specifications.

That's my .02 cents on the matter. Having said that, my SKF france bearings are going directly in the garbage because they already probably met their half life a long time ago.

I suspect, like everything else, you buy buy the cheapest China bearings you can find and the quality will be low....you buy more normally priced China bearings and the quality will be equal to similar priced bearings from Timkin, FAG, SKF etc. When we say "Chinese" bearing we tend to paint with a very wide brush. I'm old enough to remember that ANYTHING from Japan was JUNK.......25-30 years later and EVERYTHING made in Japan was state of the art. Same with Taiwan and I'm sure it will be the same with China in the coming years.......they all run on the same program. Build and sell enough cheap crap to afford better equipment to build better/more expensive items...and then do it again...and again...and... again. Increasing productivity and quality at each stage to allow them to sell increasingly better products for more money.

Even if the best company in the world phoned up China and said produce our product, here's unlimited tooling and money, that company would no longer remain the best.

All China is, is high quantity, inferior quality, bean counter, end product can't be overseen before shipped to a loading dock on this side of the world.

Quite a few women I'd label the same walking around this place...

Nothing wrong with a farm quality 4H babe. lol
 
At this point in time I'm going to say the general consensus is say no to Chinese bearings and just about any reputable manufacture that hasn't completely lost their way is going to be an acceptable replacement in a chainsaw application.
 
China is home for the bean counters and start up company's.



Agreed. It would be irresponsible to willingly put in a Chinese bearing over a non Chinese manufactured Koyo, Timken, NSK, Nachi, or SKF.



I'd agree to a point. There is potential for good product if the product is already designed and all the tooling is supplied and paid for by the parent company and they just moved production to China for the bean counter aspect. I don't think QC will be maintained in the long run. Inferior quality is going to get stamped and put in the box no matter what by the 8 year old kid running the machines.

Just because China has the blue print, doesn't mean the QC and specification is adhered to. I've worked in industry where parts come from China. Within the same brand, produced by a reputable company, albeit in China, week to week the parts coming in from China were not consistent and from week to week you'd get tight or loose components, and sometimes you would get spot on - exactly what the blue print likely said in the first place.

The difference between a superior company to an inferior company is how often the piece of crap part goes out the door. As soon as it becomes regular practice you don't know what you're getting, the company is no good. Produced in China, or anywhere in the world.

So, just because it is made in China, doesn't make it a bad product. Even a blind squirrel can find a nut once in awhile.

But I'd almost be willing to guarantee if I bought 100 bearings from Koyo-Japan and 100 bearings from Koyo-Japan-but-produced-in-China(which isn't even a thing...but if it was) then I would likely end up with a lot more PREMIUM quality bearings from Koyo-Japan than what China chose to box and ship, regardless of who's blue prints they looked at.

If Stihl shut down every factory, and moved it all to China. Sent all the tooling there. Here are the blue prints, start hammering out our flagship saws. The raw materials used are inferior, the quality control is inferior, the workers aren't putting in the work(read quality control), corners are getting cut. Things are getting put in boxes marked guaranteed pieces of crap. Within 5 years Stihl is a washed up, over priced, no name company. Only way they'd ever sell a saw again, is if their prices were slashed accordingly and I guarantee no one in professional business of using chainsaws would be buying a Stihl.

Stihl product produced by the parent company in the home country paying top dollar workers, there is less chance a crappy end product gets put in the box and sent. Specifications are more adhered to. If Stihl chose to source out some of the work to China.... as long as when the sub component is received on shore it is inspected before put into service. I'd say nothing wrong with that. Take out the middle man and China is garbage running into the ground. It's cheaper for a reason... Pretty sure quality standards go out the window and things start getting boxed on a whim.

All that being saiddddd........... kinda thinking where company's made their name then outsourced to other country's (think smaller China's...less quality cuts) are the inferior bearings. SKF Argentina is probably inferior to original SKF products. A Nachi bearing NOT made in Japan is going to be inferior to the native Japan Nachi.

A Japanese bearing is probably the best on the market, and I'd say a Koyo Japanese bearing is probably better than the rest of Japanese bearing manufacturers.

Is an SKF Argentina so inferior to a Koyo Japan bearing it wont work? Probably not SKF is still a reputable company, albeit slightly bean countered out by going to Argentina...as long as the bearing isn't hammered out directly out of the box, it should be good to go. Life of the bearing is likely the only consideration. I'm sure they'll both function the same way until failure.

Some basic linear math...not sure if the oiling principle a 2 stroke is linear...but... Chainsaw running for 20 minutes on a half liter of fuel. 15 minutes full throttle 9k RPM, 5 mins idle 3k RPM. In 20 minutes the bearing just did 150,000 revolutions. In half a liter of fuel mixed at 50:1 there is 10ml of oil.

Per minute, that bearing is only seeing .5ml of oil...or less because it's actually distributed throughout the entire bottom end.

That's a whole lot of steel on steel getting spun around with very little lubrication. I want the best bearing made of the best raw materials, produced to exacting specifications.

That's my .02 cents on the matter. Having said that, my SKF france bearings are going directly in the garbage because they already probably met their half life a long time ago.



Even if the best company in the world phoned up China and said produce our product, here's unlimited tooling and money, that company would no longer remain the best.

All China is, is high quantity, inferior quality, bean counter, end product can't be overseen before shipped to a loading dock on this side of the world.



Nothing wrong with a farm quality 4H babe. lol


I get what you're saying and don't disagree but what I was saying 50 years ago Japan was no different than China is today. All they made was cheap junk. And in 50 more years China will not likely be like it is now. This is an emerging economy.....really...look where they are now.....40 years ago you couldn't buy anything from China but bamboo and now in this short period they have gone nuclear, put satellites in orbit...not to mention making every single part to build entire Stihl and Husky clone saws of various sizes.....you name it they are doing it...they are not nor will they remain static. They are learning capitalism from the bottom up......good stuff sells for more money.....they know this but have work their way up to that level...they can't afford to step out onto the top floor just yet......but rest assured they know where the top floor is and they will get there much quicker than anyone thinks......
 
I get what you're saying and don't disagree but what I was saying 50 years ago Japan was no different than China is today. All they made was cheap junk. And in 50 more years China will not likely be like it is now. This is an emerging economy.....really...look where they are now.....40 years ago you couldn't buy anything from China but bamboo and now in this short period they have gone nuclear, put satellites in orbit...not to mention making every single part to build entire Stihl and Husky clone saws of various sizes.....you name it they are doing it...they are not nor will they remain static. They are learning capitalism from the bottom up......good stuff sells for more money.....they know this but have work their way up to that level...they can't afford to step out onto the top floor just yet......but rest assured they know where the top floor is and they will get there much quicker than anyone thinks......
Except for the whole socialism thing. Japan and Germany never dealt with that. We'll see how well the global market works with them.
 
I get what you're saying and don't disagree but what I was saying 50 years ago Japan was no different than China is today. All they made was cheap junk. And in 50 more years China will not likely be like it is now. This is an emerging economy.....really...look where they are now.....40 years ago you couldn't buy anything from China but bamboo and now in this short period they have gone nuclear, put satellites in orbit...not to mention making every single part to build entire Stihl and Husky clone saws of various sizes.....you name it they are doing it...they are not nor will they remain static. They are learning capitalism from the bottom up......good stuff sells for more money.....they know this but have work their way up to that level...they can't afford to step out onto the top floor just yet......but rest assured they know where the top floor is and they will get there much quicker than anyone thinks......

China has potential to make quality. As soon as they start producing quality the only thing making them cheaper will be the 10 year old enslaved kid doing the work.
 
Except for the whole socialism thing. Japan and Germany never dealt with that. We'll see how well the global market works with them.
True....but not sure that is a positive or negative.....unlike the stagnant Russian model we're used to seeing the Chinese are allowed just enough rope to be upwardly mobile......I live in a very small town...pop 1600-1800 or something like that.....the high school I graduated from, which is an Academy and semi private has a large contingent Chinese students that they house......not sure how many...probably 30 or more...total student body perhaps 250. These aren't third worlders.....these kids are wearing Rolexes to high school......so .... they're parents are doing OK I'd have to say.....
 
They all will fail, expecting a bearing to turn 13-15,000 rpm

How does any bearing hold together turning 13-15,000 rpm? Try that with a car motor and parts will be flying or get rebuilt every 4 seconds.
Totally agree. Just making sure people know what they're getting before they think they know what they're getting.
 
They all will fail, expecting a bearing to turn 13-15,000 rpm

How does any bearing hold together turning 13-15,000 rpm? Try that with a car motor and parts will be flying or get rebuilt every 4 seconds

Well they'll prohably all spin up to 15,000 RPM atleast one time...no matter who made it.

The better bearings will just do it for many more minutes before the balls peel themselves out of the cages and races.

An SKF 6202/c3 is rated to 28,000RPM bathed in oil. Thats frickin mental. Lol
 
Just to further beat the bearings to death...
Some of what I have on hand,
6203 Koyo=Japan
6202 Koyo=România
6203 Nachi=Japan
6202 Nachi=Japan
Misc. roller bearings
Nachi=USA
Timkin=Mexico, and are trash.
Misc. brand Axis=China, holding up okay in die grinders
EBC=China, no issues so far in drill presses, wood lathe, idler pulleys, 120/220 volt motors, etc..

Any SKF, FAG, NTN, etc. that I own are all very old stock. Bearings, bushings, thrust washers, etc. are things I keep an eye out for NOS at fleamarkets and antique stores. The last NOS SKF bearing I found were in boxes labeled “Partner/R12”, and “Hus CD”. Yeah, I bought those.
 
Couldnt help myself but to buy what I could find locally and did a little comparo out of the box.

SKF argentina 6202/c3 explorer
Koyo Romania 62022RSC3

Peeled the seals out of the koyo and washed the grease out with gas.

The SKF seems to be a much nicer bearing.
Rivets are larger on the SKF
Cage is a tighter/closer fit on the SKF(i.e built to an exacting specification)
Cage appears to be of a better quality metal (looks like a more refined finish)
SKF spins smoother and is much quiter.

Cant really tell the difference in hardness or quality of the races and balls to see which one might last longer. Probably wont ever know.

This SKF seems like its right up there in premium quality.

Honestly dont think the bearing could be built any better... definitely wont be spending any time trying to source a Japan Koyo.

Apparently my local bearing supplier could get a Nachi bearing, but he didnt say whether or not it was made in Japan, wont be sourcing that either. He was also of the opinion that SKF originally designed the deep groove ball bearing and that he thinks SKF is probably making a better deep groove ball bearing than Koyo. (His response when I asked about the Koyo 6202)

These SKF's are going in the saw. Not sure if a Koyo 6202C3 factory open is designed any differently than the 2RS version, but I wont be sourcing one to find out.

I really wanted the Koyo to be better than the SKF out of the box. But oh well. Maybe I'll just be loyal to Koyo Japan for their cup and cone bearings :bowdown::laugh:
 
With the amount of outsourcing going on these days getting good roller, tapered roller or Torrington style bearings is a crap shoot. The problem with Chinese bearings of those variety is hardness and base material content. They tend to be too hard and self destruct easily.

Case in point. I try to avoid anything from China for my engines but purchased was sent a set of PRW full roller rocker arms for the last engine build for my GTO. The engine is pretty "high end", about $12,000 worth of parts and machine work, but I topped it with a set of stainless steel full roller rockers supplied by the shop who CNC'd my cylinder heads and supplied the custom ground roller camshaft. Never gave it a second thought just figured they had good success with those items as they supplied them.

Engine goes into service, makes great power, car runs the numbers, all good to go....WRONG!

At the first oil change, apprx 200 miles my magnetic drain plug has about a teaspoon of metal "toothpaste" on it. Hum, where is all that coming from? No negative symptoms other hat a tiny bit of rocker noise, so I lash the valves and run it some more. Next oil change same deal. Re-lash the valves again as it's clattering just a tad more than I think it should and I keep driving and racing the car.

Within about 100 miles it starts clattering again in the valve train so I remove some rockers and low and behold the rollers are pretty loose on the pins, some worn out to .017" clearance. Turns out the pins for the rollers are simply too hard and getting all ground down. PRW gets them back, identifies the issue, says the corrected it (2009) but to this day we still see the same problems with them. I replaced mine with Crower Enduro rockers (USA made and very expensive, no more issues).

For bearings we see the same issues, parts that mate and ride on each other inconsistent in Rockwell hardness and "brittle" materials so they typically do NOT hold up in long term service. Buy Chinese drill bits if you want to see how brittle those materials can be.

We install a good many wheel bearings in the shop and absolutely REFUSE to use the cheap crap they sell at the auto parts stores or on-line. If you are buying $30 bearings you'll be lucky if they last 6 months. Get the $150-200 a piece versions or OEM replacements and they will go the distance every single time.

The problem with small replacement bearings is that outsourcing and re-boxing often makes it difficult if not near impossible to know what you are getting inside the package. Sometimes you can tell by the price, or by visual inspection (most cheap Chinese or other offshore crap is often dark in color on the rollers) but not always.

I've been burned enough times with this sort of thing to be very particular with parts. One last quick story of how this works. A few years ago my Kohler 12 HP engine in the JD-212 takes a dump. Turns out a mouse decided to build a nest on the engine cooling fins and it got hot and melted the ring lands on the piston in that area and the piston failed.

I just to go NAPA and order a piston/rod, hone the cylinder and put the engine back in service. It very quickly develops a double "knock" and ends up getting so loud I have to remove it. I can't find the issue anyplace, piston skirt mics fine, rod bearing to crank oil clearance OK, I'm stumped. So I'm very slowly rotating the engine and when the piston gets to BDC and TDC I see it "rock" in the bore as it changes direction. So I mic the top of the piston and it's like .030" SMALLER than the skirt....WTF???

I pay 20 times as much and source out genuine Kohler parts, reassemble and now quite a few years and hundreds of hours later flawless!

Just some things to ponder on when sourcing out parts. The NAPA Kohler piston did NOT easily identify the Country of origin for the part, I just figured it was a suitable replacement, measured the skirt clearance, ran with it and got bit in the backside pretty hard. Doubled the labor and frustration on a very simple job simply because I used junk parts from offshore........FWIW.......Cliff
 

Latest posts

Back
Top