Husqvarna 350 comparison video with cut times!

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I am picking the smoothest ones, downloading that one, then I actually use excel to create a curve... 3rd order polynomial trendline, THEN I'm taking and manually ADDING data to certain spots because the RPM #'s are not complete.... but the trick is to only add a # consistent w/ the trendline. I have 4 saws done, 3 more, then will plot on a single graph w/ color :)
 
OK..... PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me I get a prize for this....

this took about 3 hours to make.... some of this data is INTERPOLATED BY ME... not necessarily RAW. Excel will not plot overlays like this, so I had to import RAW data into excel, create data points where they didn't exist (for instance, HP/torque is not necessarily measured at every 250 rpm interval) so I had to complete the data so it ended up not just being correct looking, but also had an appropriate RPM range for all 7 saws. ie, some saws went from 12.5k to 500rpm wheras some only had data from 13.5 to 5000 rpm or so.... you get the idea. anywho... I took the RAW DATA in excel, plotted a 2nd or 3rd order polynomial trendline on it, whichever seemed to match better, then when I added data point I made sure it didn't mess with the trendline too much....ie...I'm not adding data on a COMPLETELY random basis...its at least slightly objective data even if it is interpolated. the really cruddy thing is that I CANNOT export the 2nd order poly data from excel. I can photograph my work in excel, by taking screenshots, but there is no "raw data" from a trendline available. sorry.

anyway, without further adieu....



compilation PIC on DAT PLOT 7 saws!.jpg
 
I'd recommend throwing out everything not between 8K-12K. Everything else is irrelevant to the operation of a chainsaw. Also, those spikes, both high and low, are obvious data anomalies. The real number is going to be along a much smoother curve, in line with the rest of the data points. The graph of the HP of an engine results in a curve, generally rising to a single peak at high RPM, then falling of rather quickly.

As mentioned in the discussion elsewhere, I agree that a much more consistent and controllable method of controlling load is going to be needed. That will eliminate all these spikes and valleys.

With that said, I stand in amazement at the knowledge and ability of the guys developing this dyno. No way could I come up with something like this! It's anxious to see where this project ends up. A tool like this would be a tremendous asset to a saw builder. Kudos guys!
 
I wish I could have taken the raw data and simply applied a curve exported curve and then plotted it

The problem is that there are many curves and shapes and who knows which is right and which is wrong I did my best to interpolate the data and add points to Simply smooth things out best I could hope everyone likes the graphs of Interest I can add or delete lines fairly easily so if you wanted to compare two different size on the same graph it's easy to do
 
Interesting the Hiway makes more power earlier in the powerband. Curious if that is a function of your porting, the construction of the jug, or a combination of both?
 
The curves that seemed to fit best were 3rd order polynomial trendlines. when the dyno gets a little more dialed it, it'll be exciting to see how numbers change. also, keep in mind, I'm using numbers from one of usually 3 runs per saw.... i used the "best" looking run out of each.
 
Just so everyone has a comparison, saw #4 is my ported oem 346xp jug. saw #3 is the kafar kit with a VERY open muffler..... saw #3 was BY FAR the slowest of the bunch in NY.
What you're seeing is that the saw with the lowest RPM peak HP is the slowest saw. By the same token, the saw that makes it's peak HP at the highest RPM will cut the fastest, given it's not a super peaky powerband.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top