MS460WOODCHUCK
Addicted to ArboristSite
This is what I thought, just wanted it to be confirmed.
A while ago, I found a 1991 Jonsered document that said these saws were made at the Husky factory in Sweden, despite there was no Husky version.
Supposed to go look at a Jred 2083 in a bit . Is parts still available for these saws?
Documentation is always appreciated
......... .
Any way to tell what year a 2083 turbo is? Looks like the ID tag is different than the newer Jreds.
5370202
202nd built in the 37th week of 1995
A while ago, I found a 1991 Jonsered document that said these saws were made at the Husky factory in Sweden, despite there was no Husky version.
Is the Partner 660 the same as the Poulan Pro 415?
415 or 425 or both, not sure (= have no idea) what the difference is.
Edit; It might be the "Super Clean" that makes the difference........
Hi. I just stumbled on this thread searching for information on an engineering prototype saw I got to try out in Huskvarna, Sweden in 1988 .Partner P 7700 - the missing link !&?
Some time ago I found this http://www.acresinternet.com/cscc.n...6adf5cb67508fb4c88256e0e0078a865?OpenDocument
..in the Stolen Saws section at CSCC.
Except for the colour, it reminds me very much of the Jonsered 2077, which reputedly was "inherited" by Jred from Partner after E-lux takeover. I have never heard that the saw was marketed as a Partner.
Serial number starts with a 4, wich indicates 1994, doesn't it? As the 2077 was avaliable before that, in my mind it indicates that the Partner saw was NOT a prototype, but a production saw!
Another option could be that it indeed is a prototype, made in 1984. I am not quite certain of the E-lux numbering system
Does anyone know more about this?
Edit; We got closer to the truth later in the thread - read on!
The test results were 3.1 kW (usually 4.2 hp), and 5.5 kg for the 254xp.
For the 357xp they were 3.0 kW (usually 4.1 hp), and 5.9 kg.
I have been reluctant to refer to the tested power output of the 357xp, as the test saw(s?) were of very early production, and there are a lot of indications that the model generally doesn't have .2 kW less output than Huskys rating.
I have no reason to believe that the weight difference isn't typical, though.
The results also tell us that the 254xp had a lot more vibrations at the rear handle, under load, than the 357xp.
View attachment 715569 View attachment 715568
Hi. I just stumbled on this thread searching for information on an engineering prototype saw I got to try out in Huskvarna, Sweden in 1988 .
Enter your email address to join: