- Joined
- Dec 6, 2014
- Messages
- 21,251
- Reaction score
- 25,194
Yeah, but the real story behind the saw would be helpful........Cant kill them they can be resurrected!
Yeah, but the real story behind the saw would be helpful........Cant kill them they can be resurrected!
They never tell you that and it sure would help.Yeah, but the real story behind the saw would be helpful........
I dont know anything yet.Has he indicated that he has done a proper pressure test?
Post 1 saidHas he indicated that he has done a proper pressure test?
Listen it ain't uncommon at all to pass pres and fail vac. I have seen this quite a few times crank seals tend to fail at vac because of the lip .If you get a saw to pass a pressure test, and fail a vac test, then you have a real oddity. I have never seen it, but that means nothing.
But since the folks here have not even performed a pressure test. Well..........
I will bow out.... I see things heading south quickly.....Most techs call that good, as the anomaly of a saw that holds pressure, but not vac, is highly unlikely, and is probably non existant,
but they leave that option out there, to cover their arse. The real sad reality is that almost no one here actually does a proper
leakdown test.....
You would like to see me post it right from the Stihl manuel maybe?I will bow out.... I see things heading south quickly.....
I have leave saw for 24 hours in presure and 24 in vacuum it holdDoing a proper pressure test on a saw, you block it down, and put psi. to it. Go to lunch, and the psi should be real close when you get back.
this service manual its not for the same saw , you confuse the operator
What do you mean?I am not trying to argue with you two, but the saw in this thread doesn't apply.
Like I said IDK what he has there Im waiting .Squirting some air psi in the butt of a saw and looking for bubbles does not equal a good pressure test..... And if he hasn't even done that, how can we believe that he has actually done a good vac test?
Enter your email address to join: