The official W.Ky Buildoff Poll

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Build off saw

  • 066/660

    Votes: 66 62.3%
  • 346

    Votes: 40 37.7%

  • Total voters
    106
i have to agree with jon.
was it a race or a build off?
if it was a race the cut out's should have been dq'ed.
if 1 saw/person gets a second chance then every saw/person should.
we all got along and had a great time, but that does not mean that the results are not skewed.
i feel the best thing to do is post all the times
 
i have to agree with jon.
was it a race or a build off?
if it was a race the cut out's should have been dq'ed.
if 1 saw/person gets a second chance then every saw/person should.
we all got along and had a great time, but that does not mean that the results are not skewed.
i feel the best thing to do is post all the times

Ya, I wouldn't mind seeing the times.
 
i have to agree with jon.
was it a race or a build off?
if it was a race the cut out's should have been dq'ed.
if 1 saw/person gets a second chance then every saw/person should.
we all got along and had a great time, but that does not mean that the results are not skewed.
i feel the best thing to do is post all the times

I don't believe anyone in the top 3 had a re-run that improved their time? In fact Erics saws was almost the same time with the 7 and 8 pin drives. You can check on Youtube to verify. SO I dont' think the results were skewed at all, the order was determined off the first runs. Eric didn't cut out and neither did Nate, I'm not sure where the re-runs you are talking about came from?
 
My 066 picked up around 2 seconds on the second cut. I changed nothing except the way I pushed it in the wood. The saw is also still breakin in too I believe. I'm not worried to much about the times. Just glad to be a part of it, At least I beat the stock saw (I think).:rock:
 
JD had bogged down Jon's saw so re-ran it and IIRC, the second run gave him the second fastest time.

But, as was said, second run doesn't count.

I remember JD doing that but I guess I didn't know it was the second fastest time? I guess I thought the argument was that Eric and Nate had a re-run that improved their time and that is what the fuss was about which isn't the case. I guess maybe they all should have had re-runs, who knows, maybe they could have gotten a faster time too? It is what it is I guess!
 
Last edited:
I don't believe anyone in the top 3 had a re-run that improved their time? In fact Erics saws was almost the same time with the 7 and 8 pin drives. You can check on Youtube to verify. SO I dont' think the results were skewed at all, the order was determined off the first runs. Eric didn't cut out and neither did Nate, I'm not sure where the re-runs you are talking about came from?

Frank, just sayin nate and I had times in the 24's as well but you can't tell that from the winning times posted. So we are just asking for the complete cut record to be shown then people can compare.
 
Frank, just sayin nate and I had times in the 24's as well but you can't tell that from the winning times posted. So we are just asking for the complete cut record to be shown then people can compare.

When I was on the phone with J that's what he found in the time sheet.

Nate's saw and your saw were both in the 24's....
 
Sorry I been slackin. :(

I been meanin to figure all these out the last few nights, but have been workin thru lunch at the plant. Sucks havin to work for a livin. :laugh:

Anyhoo, here's what I got.

These are the official first runs.
33e71fbe.jpg


Here's where some ran again with different rims and what not.
6a8dff61.jpg


Here's the 346's.

dae2e349.jpg


And this is a bumble bee I drew for y'all.

02a02ed3.jpg


Regardless, nobody beat Randy's first place time, so not sure what the hub bub is all about???

Second place is the first loser. :laugh:

I had a blast gettin smoked. :)
 
Back
Top