Ported 026 Squish Check

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I never said it's the only way, there's tons of ways and I'm interested in all of them.

I port 066/660's mostly and have done 100's of them and there's simply no way to port one of them to where they will run and have less than 200lbs. The exhaust needs to be a 100 or more and compression is a byproduct of that.
 
In my 066 I had a guy cut squish for me who didn't fully understand what I wanted. He cut a taper from the cylinder wall to the combustion chamber. It was about .050 taper from the edge to the cc. After that I sent it to Carl to take another .020 out of squish. So now I have a flat but not huge squish band and a .030 taper to the combustion chamber
 
I never said it's the only way, there's tons of ways and I'm interested in all of them.

I port 066/660's mostly and have done 100's of them and there's simply no way to port one of them to where they will run and have less than 200lbs. The exhaust needs to be a 100 or more and compression is a byproduct of that.
Yes the 660 likes some compression. Not every engine is the same.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
 
In my 066 I had a guy cut squish for me who didn't fully understand what I wanted. He cut a taper from the cylinder wall to the combustion chamber. It was about .050 taper from the edge to the cc. After that I sent it to Carl to take another .020 out of squish. So now I have a flat but not huge squish band and a .030 taper to the combustion chamber
Seems pretty sporty too.
 
Its extremely hard to eliminate alot of variables to test one cylinder design vs. another on an 026 in particular.

I have one ported with a factory combustion chamber and 200 psi. It runs quite well actually.

It does not have the grunt of the 026 with the flat band and 40 psi more compression. It just doesnt, for real. Same carb, same timing advance, same muff mod.

Its a hell of a lot less work to use the factory chamber.

I plan on experimenting with a tig welded and reshaped combustion chamber to bump compression while maintaining factory piston and squish band geometry.
 
Wow. Now that I take a closer look at that, it doesn't look like that cylinder has a combustion chamber, rather just a pocket for the spark plug. "You've come a long ways, baby!"

It is all chamber + the plug pocket. Just a taper from the edge to the plug, you can see the factory shaper tool marks in the chamber. Looks like about 3* with no "squish band".
 
I find the discussion fascinating.

I appreciate it as well. The honest caution of these porters has gained more of my respect.
In teaching my sons about life I've always told them to spare your words before the challenge, and do your talking after the "doing is done"
I believe I sense that here. Thanks guys for being candid without being cocky, and for sharing what you know with us.
 
The squish band must be tapered because the intent is to create a constant gas velocity, and the diameter at the outside is greater than the diameter at the edge of the combustion chamber. If you try to squeeze the gas from the outside through a smaller aperture then the velocity, pressure and temperatures must increase. Therefore the height of the squish band must increase as you move closer to the combustion chamber to keep the aperture area constant.

The energy that goes into increasing the velocity, pressure and temperature of the gas comes from the fuel and is not converted directly into mechanical energy, so it is waste except to the extent that it might improve combustion efficiencies.

Hey buddy, good to see ya postin. Wishing you warmth and happiness for the holidays.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top