What's the future for wood furnaces and stoves?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Mustang71

Addicted to ArboristSite
AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Sep 30, 2016
Messages
2,339
Reaction score
2,430
Location
Somerset NY
I ask because I'm ready to throw this 5 year old daka in the scrap pile and buy an englander furnace.

Then I stop my self and think if I can buy a secondary burn EPA furnace for a grand today then what will I be able to buy for that price in 5 years. Things like the drolet are a ridiculous price. I can get a 98 percent efficent modulating lennox furnace for 1600 y pay 4500 for a wood furnace.

What's the future for non EPA stuff?
 
I think non epa stoves sill still be sold for a while.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I agree but clearly something needs to be done because a furnace with a secondary burn and the efficiency of a stove is 4 times the price. There needs to be a minimum efficiency like gas furnaces and boilers.
 
I have burning restrictions from time to time due to inversion layers. I completely ignore and burn regardless. Nobody has ever said a thing, and if they did I would tell them to kiss my john brown.
 
I think after my non EPA stove rusts out " it will " I'll be done cutting wood and succumb to a high efficiency heatpump.

Can't believe California carries that much clout.
 
I ask because I'm ready to throw this 5 year old daka in the scrap pile and buy an englander furnace.

Then I stop my self and think if I can buy a secondary burn EPA furnace for a grand today then what will I be able to buy for that price in 5 years. Things like the drolet are a ridiculous price. I can get a 98 percent efficent modulating lennox furnace for 1600 y pay 4500 for a wood furnace.

What's the future for non EPA stuff?

Drolets are 4500??
 
Seems lot of people get caught up on efficiency percentages. Thing is....a lot of the high efficiency wood burners are much fussier about what goes in them and have more electronics that can fail/need to be replaced.

Kind of like silly chainsaw wars. My saw is .2 lbs. lighter than yours and .1 more hp. Who gives a ****. Why aren't you mentioning that it cost twice as much and is twice as expensive to repair? At the end of the day they both cut wood an do what they are intended to do.

Some people would rather just burn an extra cord or two than worry if the wood is X% seasoned and so on, and need a computer science degree to operate it. Sometimes simple is better.
 
5 years isn't very good for a furnace.

Is it shot? Or it just doesn't work right?

Nothing wrong with it but it's horrible on wood consumption and needs to be watched. Get it fully going by 6 PM put 4 to 5 logs in it and by 8pm it's down to coals. Some days that means good heat if you watch it other days it's not as much heat if you weren't moving the logs around.
 
I still use an old wood/coal stove that was here when I bought the house 15 years ago. It has been patched back together 3 times and completely rebuilt once. Regardless of what government regulations pass, people who live in free areas of the country will use what they have and not care. Anyone who is handy with a welder and has access to steel can build a wood stove. The basic design is pretty simple. If it is efficiency that you want check into rocket mass heaters. I have built a rocket stove using nothing more than mud and ash from my own yard. There are to many simple ways to heat with wood for government to ever get rid of it.
 
IF they do decide to,IMHO,it would be a combination of people not burning what they should be,and those OWB that sit and smolder 24/7.There is a place in the town is live in on the main drag,2 family's have OWB's,it's in a low lying area, and you'd think it's foggy all the time.
Or the let's cut green in September and burn in October crowd
 

Latest posts

Back
Top