Iska3
Addicted to ArboristSite
I’m stayin’ with my 75 number. :hmm3grin2orange:
I like your way of thinking and I'm right behind you as far as being a 75 but like marc said..
"The problem is not with different people's differing interpretation of the criteria given. The problem is that there was room for interpretation in the criteria in the first place. We've been told this is a sliding scale from 0 to 200 but everyone has been using different guesses on why based on the "clues" WCTV has given about this nebulous, half defined concept based around self reliance. A badly posed question yields bad information. Garbage in, garbage out."
This is like asking a peson to go and buy a can of white paint. What color is white... Too many interp's of white. A badly posed question yields bad information.
I'd rather be fishing with CK then to play this mind game.