Is this proper trimming?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ScottTree

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
35
Reaction score
8
Location
CA
20160102_153356.jpg 20160102_153424.jpg 20160102_153455.jpg 20160102_153751.jpg Is this good way to trim. Yes or No? And why? Ty.
 

Attachments

  • 20160102_153356.jpg
    20160102_153356.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 22
  • 20160102_153424.jpg
    20160102_153424.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 23
  • 20160102_153455.jpg
    20160102_153455.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 24
  • 20160102_153751.jpg
    20160102_153751.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 22
This is where a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing and one of the reasons the latest trend in reduction pruning has me concerned. From the pictures somebody knew enough to reduce to a node, but threw out entirely any standard of reducing to something that can become terminal. Many cuts are flush and will not compartmentalize well.
Those who are practicing reduction pruning properly will not leave a tree looking mutilated as those do.
 
I am hesitant to even give that much credit. I wouldn't put that in the same room as reduction cutting. It is topping pure and simple. Yes...they left a few more branches than a "proper" topping job, but that does not make it "less bad". Those trees will have all of the problems of topped trees and none of the characteristics of reduced trees.
 
According to both British and Australian standard for amenity tree pruning that's lopping and/or topping.

Read these

BS 3998 for UK

AS 4373 for Oz
 
OP, what are the circumstances surrounding these trees? Did you do the work? Did a competitor of yours do the work? Are you the property owner?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top