keithonline said:
Here's a couple pictures of the leaf. I'm still curious why you wouldn't want to fill it, especially if rotting is an aerobic process, and this would help keep out air (and water).
Thanks for the input. This is actually the best Q&A site I've found so far.
Keith
That is a Red Maple, Acer rubrum.
Tree cavity filling seems like an excellent idea to non-arborists and even some arborists, because thats what dentists do to our teeth and it helps us, so it seems to follow that it would work for wood too.
But the fact is, wood is less like teeth and more like bone or even muscle.
Much of it is alive and reactive. When it is injured, it sets up walls in all directions, to stop decay advancement. It abandons a compartment of wood and sets up four physical/chemical walls around it. Animals, ants, decay fungi, can all have at it in that abandoned area of wood, and the tree can stand strong.
Google "CODIT" for about 10 million hits on the subject.
Because the reaction to the injury is part of a living process, tree health and vigor is much more important than what's going on inside that abandoned area of wood.
Imagine if you were to encounter two individuals, a 20 year old, athletic, football player, and a feeble 90 year old, 3 pack a day smoker. Now, give each one a swift kick in the ribs.
Like humans, how trees react to injury is very much based on their age and health at the time of the injury, as well as the care they receive after.