dneiger
ArboristSite Operative
For something interesting to do I did some comparing of the Stihl 361 and the Husq 357, however it seemed to long to take up space here so I posted it on Other Sponsors Forum under Neigers Saw Shop.
Dave
Dave
Saw comparisons
- Thread starter dneiger
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
Tony Snyder
Addicted to ArboristSite
Good choice.
In a nut shell...
The stihl weighs a pound less and cuts almost 8/10 a second slower.
The stihl weighs a pound less and cuts almost 8/10 a second slower.
dneiger
ArboristSite Operative
Saw weights 357- 361
There was one thing that I did not put in the comparison, I did not leave it out on purpose, and that was the Husq. has heated handles. However Husqvarna list the weight as being the same as the standard model and in checking with one of the biggest dealers in the State they confirmed it. When I tear this one down I will try and weigh the heater components. Sorry about the oversight.
Dave
There was one thing that I did not put in the comparison, I did not leave it out on purpose, and that was the Husq. has heated handles. However Husqvarna list the weight as being the same as the standard model and in checking with one of the biggest dealers in the State they confirmed it. When I tear this one down I will try and weigh the heater components. Sorry about the oversight.
Dave
test
I would like to see the 361 results after about 10 to 12 tanks. I have seen it take that long to actually seat the rings. They are durable, but they take a long time to fully seat in the bore.
I would like to see the 361 results after about 10 to 12 tanks. I have seen it take that long to actually seat the rings. They are durable, but they take a long time to fully seat in the bore.
Similar threads
