Thinking of buying a new wood stove for next winter

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jeff Lary

Addicted to ArboristSite
AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
2,914
Reaction score
1,494
Location
Hartland Maine
Hi all I have heated our 1400 sq. ft. home with an Free standing Old Mill om25 woodstove since I bought it new back in 1986. It has a 2.0 cu ft. fire box I want my next stove to have a larger box with longer burn time. I fill the stove at 8:30 at night and at 6am there are coals to start from but now much heat left. I have done some online looking over the past year cause I been thinking this way for awhile. My stove takes 2' wood but I cut mine 20"-22" long and that is manageable for the both of us.
I searched large efficient stoves , big wood stoves ect. My main complaint is I want to be able to put more wood in the stove at once. This one does not have an ash pan, I just move the hot coals to the back and shovel out the ashes. The next stove probably will have an ash pan .
I looked at Vermont castings Vigilant and Blaze King either one looks like it would do the job. I do not want a stove that I have to replace a bunch of consumable stuff every other year. Some of the stoves look kind of high tech/ high maintainace with all sorts of moving parts to contend with. But many sites say they will heat with less wood than the older less efficient stoves. But I don't get to sucked into all that hype either. I am sure thay have made advances with stove since 1987 though.
Mainly I want a big, seething, fire breathing beast ,that will still be putting out heat after 10 hours. Does anyone have a favorite stove I should consider? Also who here has a Vermont castings Vigilant or a Blaze King. I am open to more research based on a good honest recommendation on any other models. Thanks Jeff
 
+1 Blaze King. Burn times measured in days, not hours. Built to last a lifetime.

I dont know of any other stove on the market that consistantly heats for 24 hrs while burning pine. That is the REAL test for a woodstove. Now if you are talking hardwood, you are looking at 30-40 hours depending on your home. Again, no other stove can match that performance.
 
Well thanks for the responses, I agree on Vermont I knew that when I posted. You see I just did not want to look like I already made up my mind. I read some bad stuff about Vermont poor longevity. Heat expectations not met. Blaze king is top of my list so far. Quadrafire is one I want to look at again and I will. Like I said big firebox long burn times are 2 things I will have.
 
I have a blaze king princess, this is simple an awesome stove that I would recommend to anyone, its a pleasure to use...
16" wood though and I think around a 2.8 cubic foot sized box, halfway through the second with ours and its great
 
I have a Quadrafire 3100i with a 2.1 cubic foot firebox (had it 10 years here) and I do like it a lot, but if I had the option to switch to a new stove, I wouldn't stay with my Quad, I'd go with a Blaze King catalytic for the burn times and the turn-down.
 
Yea those are nice stoves to be sure. I know you can buy all sorts of fancy do-dads for some of them hua. I guess my next step is to go and see some in person. I need to figure out what I am going to do before I saw up next years wood. I have it all cut and yarded tree length next step is cut it to length.
 
yea scary hua I paid 600 for the stove I have now back in 87. I suppose back then 600 was like 3k today? There seems to only 2-3 places in Maine to buy one and 2 of these are owned by the same guy ha ha.
 
Hi all I have heated our 1400 sq. ft. home with an Free standing Old Mill om25 woodstove since I bought it new back in 1986. It has a 2.0 cu ft. fire box I want my next stove to have a larger box with longer burn time. I fill the stove at 8:30 at night and at 6am there are coals to start from but now much heat left. I have done some online looking over the past year cause I been thinking this way for awhile. My stove takes 2' wood but I cut mine 20"-22" long and that is manageable for the both of us.
I searched large efficient stoves , big wood stoves ect. My main complaint is I want to be able to put more wood in the stove at once. This one does not have an ash pan, I just move the hot coals to the back and shovel out the ashes. The next stove probably will have an ash pan .
I looked at Vermont castings Vigilant and Blaze King either one looks like it would do the job. I do not want a stove that I have to replace a bunch of consumable stuff every other year. Some of the stoves look kind of high tech/ high maintainace with all sorts of moving parts to contend with. But many sites say they will heat with less wood than the older less efficient stoves. But I don't get to sucked into all that hype either. I am sure thay have made advances with stove since 1987 though.
Mainly I want a big, seething, fire breathing beast ,that will still be putting out heat after 10 hours. Does anyone have a favorite stove I should consider? Also who here has a Vermont castings Vigilant or a Blaze King. I am open to more research based on a good honest recommendation on any other models. Thanks Jeff

I wouldn't be complaining about an 8 hour burn time.Thats very good.As for V/C .Scratch it off your list.No where as good as they once were.Very few wood stoves(room heaters) that will give you an HONEST 8 to 10 hrs. of real heat.
 
Well I know you are right 8 hrs is pretty good. I will say this not bragging but this is the truth. All my friends and relatives that burn wood at one time or another have commented on the power/ heat supplied by my Old Mill. They were no joke back in their time. It takes 4 strong men to lift this unit 1/4 boiler plate w/ a 1/2" cast iron door this is not a throwaway unit for sure. I paid 600 for mine 28 years later they still bring $500-600 well used. I have replaced some of my fire brick a couple of times but that's it. Now i was just looking at Harmon stoves and was reading reviews and a guy was saying that his was less than 10 years old and he was looking at $ 1,000.00 in consumables to replace before next season. He said well I may just buy the new next size up. To me $1,000.00 in replacement parts cost in 30 years is crazy!!! say nothing about less than 10 when the purchase price was over $2,000.00 to start with.
 
The englander is a good value large firebox.

Agreed, if you're on a tight budget an Englander NC-30 is an excellent choice. I have some friends with an Englander NC-30 and they love it, however I've been super impressed with my friends who have a Blaze King (king and princess)and the burn times they get.
 
Yea its going to come down to a 2 or 3 stove choice I think. Like I said I need to physically go touch some of the new stuff. I would not mind $100.00 every 3-5 years for "up keep" but that is about my tight azz limit ha ha.
 
Yea its going to come down to a 2 or 3 stove choice I think. Like I said I need to physically go touch some of the new stuff. I would not mind $100.00 every 3-5 years for "up keep" but that is about my tight azz limit ha ha.

Cat based stoves plan on replacing the cat on them every 5-7 years on average. If you get an aftermarket unit they generally run about $160-225 so overall the upkeep on a cat stove isn't going to be super high. How you treat your stove also plays into how much maintenance you have as well.
 
Back
Top