What is the very best wood stove. Price no consideration

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I thought I was quite clear on what I wanted to do, but I'll type it again VERY slowly.... I'd like a wood stove for my basement that would only be used when the power was out more than 2-4 hours. I wouldn't want an integrated 120volt fan as it would be back up when power was non existent. I'd like it to be visually pleasing but that's not a deal breaker if performance and cost made up for looks. I've got a 6" flue into a chimney to work with.
If it were extremely efficient I might use it as primary heat at the beginning and end of the heating season, but that would be short term at best, if at all.


I was actually responding to the initial post, but I'll try to help you out. I have a Fisher stove that I took out of a house I tore down. I have no need for it. It appears to be in good shape other than some surface rust that will come off with a wire wheel in a few minutes. It is yours free if you want to pick it up (not sure how long a drive it is for you to central NC) and I have a tractor to load it in your truck. It is a heavy SOB. I was planning to sell it on Craigslist, but I haven't gotten around to it in the last 3 years, so I'm guessing I never will. I'm also a bit torn about putting it back into service when there are more efficient and less polluting stoves available. I have a neighbor (thankfully downwind from me) who burns an old smoke dragon and from the looks of it burns freshly cut wood and perhaps old tires, so I'm sensitive about the pollution issue.

Since you are using it for occasional power failure use, in my opinion the best stove for you is one that doesn't cost you a lot. Return on investment just isn't there for a high dollar modern stove. It need not be efficient since it will rarely get used. If it smokes more than a modern stove, it won't be a month-in, month-out kind of thing and you will probably be burning decently dry wood since it will have time to dry between power failures. From all I've read, the Fisher is a good stove even if not up to todays standards.

With regard to the OP, I should have tried to be more helpful and less of a smart-ass. "Best" is determined by function. Yes, you can figure out what stove is most efficient, but it may not be the appropriate stove for you. For example, To determine what stove would be best for you, you will need at a minimum to specify how big your house is and how well insulated it is. That is a VERY rough beginning point, but it is at least some information to work from.

As an example of how I chose my stove, I had an engineer evaluate my house and determine how many BTU/hour it should take to heat it at particular inside to outside temperature differentials. That gave me a starting point so that I would at least have a reasonable idea of how big or small a stove I need.

Then I had to make choices taking into consideration that my house has extremely high thermal mass, how warm I want the house to be, how often I would like to fire the stove, etc.

I was very intrigued by the Twin-fire stove as it is extremely efficient and the aesthetics would work well with my modern house. After figuring out what the actual energy needs of my house are, and how I anticipated using the stove, I ended up with a Pacific Energy Fusion and it works extremely well in my house.
 
If you want a stove for only 2 hours if your power accidentally goes out then just buy a generator . Don't even bother with wood heat . That's not what woodstoves are designed for and by the time you invest in the stove the liner the install the tools and equipment required your not saving a penny or helping your cause
 
If you want a stove for only 2 hours if your power accidentally goes out then just buy a generator . Don't even bother with wood heat . That's not what woodstoves are designed for and by the time you invest in the stove the liner the install the tools and equipment required your not saving a penny or helping your cause

LOL, paying attention to what's in type is always important. I typed at least 2 hours or more, such as a mass power outage from severe weather which could last for days. In 98 we were without power 8 days from an ice storm. If it were just a 1-2 hour issue then no it's not worth any investment of time or money as my house will easily stay warm that long.

It's MUCH better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
 
Back
Top