My compression tests and 044 questions

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

KMB

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Oct 13, 2005
Messages
2,897
Reaction score
402
Location
Missouri
My compression gauge is from HF, I know cheap. I recently replaced the tester’s schrader valve with a new one from Snap-on (the tester was giving inconsistent readings and then it stopped reading period). Tests done cold.

Stihl 044 = 140 psi
Stihl 260 = 170 psi
Olympyk 970 = 185 psi
Shindawia T260 (string trimmer) = 165 psi
(friends Stihl 028 WB = 160 psi)

With the exception of the 044, all have original pistons and cylinders. The string trimmer and friends 028 are stock, the 260 and 970 have muffler mods, and the 044 has a DP cover. I believe my compression tester is working properly. The 970 reading of 185 psi definitely feels right when I pull the saw over. The other readings sound about right…except for the 044.

The 044 bothers me. A bit on the history of the saw (rebuild was completed at the end of February 2008). I got the saw as a non-running project. The piston that was in the saw had some scoring on the intake side. The saw pulled over, and the compression felt good, but I didn’t get a compression tester until the saw was mostly apart. I now know better and will check compression on any new project saws before taking apart.

The original piston, that was in the saw, had some scoring on the intake side. I cleaned up the cylinder with a little acid, gave it a light hone (just enough to get the cross hatching using a Silicone Carbide 320 grit Flex-hone) and put in the Bailey’s ($25 or $30) piston and rings (I don’t think they had the other 044 piston options at the time I bought mine). I know OEM is better, but this was a budget build. I got a new base gasket from my local dealer. Again, I know better now…I should have measured the new gasket thickness. It was my first rebuild, but I made sure that the piston was in the right direction (arrow pointed toward the exhaust). I should add that I had also did vacuum and pressure tests which the saw passed. After the saw was together, I did what I believe is called ‘heat cycles’ where I let the saw idle fairly high for a few minutes, then let it sit for a few minutes, then let it idle fairly high…and so on a few times. I had replaced the original starter handle with an elasto-start handle, and the compression has always felt low. I should have recorded the first cold compression test, but I think it was about 135-140 psi. I thought that as I used the saw, the rings would seat and compression would go up. To me, having only run one other 440 to cut a few cookies one time, my 044 ran good and I was impressed. But after many tanks (don’t have a record) the compression is only 140 psi.

To me that sounds low for having the top-end rebuilt and with enough break-in time. Maybe it needs more time? Compression issues usually mean dealing with the rings, I guess new rings should be tried first? Try a new base gasket? I question the base gasket because it was an aftermarket one, and I don’t know if it is thicker than an OEM one. The saw idles fine. ‘Seems’ to run strong in the cut…but maybe I don’t know how ‘strong’ this saw can really be with proper compression. I don’t think I need to do another vacuum and pressure test. I don’t think this is it, but do I need to try another piston (and rings), and a different base gasket? Anything else I’ve missed? I’m thinking that the compression should be about 160 psi (cold, after break-in, stock base gasket) after a top-end rebuild for this saw…from what I have read here on AS from the knowledgeable members.

OR…just run it…but I think there should be more potential out of my saw as it is (stock base gasket).

Pics of piston through exhaust as the saw is now (not the best pictures with using the flash):

attachment.php


attachment.php


What say y’all.

Kevin
 
140psi is fine, and if it is running with power I wouldn't worry about what the tester is saying. Also you have to remember that you are using a used cylinder with a new piston and it could have a little wear and tear. Most saws I have are in the 140-160psi range, perfectly acceptable.


I think you are worrying just a little bit too much. ;)
 
140psi is fine, and if it is running with power I wouldn't worry about what the tester is saying. Also you have to remember that you are using a used cylinder with a new piston and it could have a little wear and tear. Most saws I have are in the 140-160psi range, perfectly acceptable.


I think you are worrying just a little bit too much. ;)

I have been accused of that (worrying) on other matters also. :)

Kevin
 
I put a new piston in the old 044 cylinder I have and got 175psi right after I put it together.

OEM or aftermarket piston? If aftermarket, which one? Did you do any cylinder prep such as honing? And do use a base gasket?

Kevin
 
I would expect a "honed" cylinder to have lower compression than original factory, Its a certainty that the bore will not be as true as it was, more will have been honed local areas than others and the overall piston fit will be a bit slack leading to more piston rocing and unseating of the ring.

Faller is likely giving you some good advice in recouping some of the lost compression, just check your squish height first.
 
I would expect a "honed" cylinder to have lower compression than original factory, Its a certainty that the bore will not be as true as it was, more will have been honed local areas than others and the overall piston fit will be a bit slack leading to more piston rocing and unseating of the ring.

Faller is likely giving you some good advice in recouping some of the lost compression, just check your squish height first.

Yes a squish too thin and that's nothing but bad news.
 
I would expect a "honed" cylinder to have lower compression than original factory, Its a certainty that the bore will not be as true as it was, more will have been honed local areas than others and the overall piston fit will be a bit slack leading to more piston rocing and unseating of the ring.

Faller is likely giving you some good advice in recouping some of the lost compression, just check your squish height first.

Makes sense to me...thanks.

Now I'll have to do a search on how to properly measure my squish.

Kevin
 
Do a search, I think 140 is nearing the bottom end on the compression scale for a stihl.
Lakeside would say 'it's on it's way out' I also think it should be about 160+ after a rebuild. Somethings not correct. IMHO
 
Last edited:
I also think it should be about 160+ after a rebuild. Somethings not correct. IMHO

:agree2::agree2: might check the ring end gap too. I would probably order a meteor piston and rings and get rid of the "chicom garbage" as I have heard it called before LOL. But that is just me.
 
Last edited:
Yep, I just don't know what the facination with honing is here, must be a 4 stroke thing where you have removable heads so hone can pass right through 1/3 the stone beyond the end sto keep from tapering the bore, nothing like ports in the cylinder walls on a 4 stroke either to bounce the hones all over taking the bore out of round and most times no paper thin nikasil coating to worry about.

On a blind bore cylinder, far better just to touch up any bad spots by hand, if the cuts are so deep acid can't be used for fear of eating the metal behind the plate the jug was junk anyway as far as restorative measures.
 
I've never used a hone seems like it can screw things up.

You are lucky you have that much compression. Do not hone two strokes.

Before I honed my cylinder, I did a pretty good search here on AS to see what other members were doing and their reasoning and so on. There were opinions/comments of 'for' and 'against'. I chose do a 'light' hone after the acid treatment. I'm guessing that the folks that had good results after honing were the ones that used OEM piston and rings or high quality name aftermarket piston and rings. I'm guessing the OEM and high quality aftermarket stuff fit better (closer to spec?).

So far timberwolf has given the best explanation/reason why my compression is low. If I can be satisfied in my ability to get an accurate measurement of squish, then I might try removing the base gasket. I would hate to get a wrong measurement, remove the gasket and ruin my saw. I don't have the money or time to be rebuilding my saw because I messed up. For my mechanical skills, I think a muffler mod is my limit...for now. But I will try to get a squish measurement and see how that goes.

After my experience thus far with my 044 rebuild and the results, my next rebuild will having OEM piston and rings (if the wallet allows at the time) or a proven high quailty aftermarket product like Meteor.

Kevin
 
Yup, measure squish and go from there. .020 is a good number for a work saw, any less and you might want to consider another form of base gasket to get it up to that number. 140psi is low IMO. Good advice from the other replies.
 
timberwolf, might an OEM or Meteor piston and rings 'fit' better (than the cheaper piston and rings I have now) in my 'honed' 044 to raise the compression? I know it would not raise the compression like removing the base gasket would...keeping the squish in mind.

Kevin
 

Latest posts

Back
Top